Are Malaysian universities prioritising rankings over teaching quality?

Question

Accepted Answer

Malaysian Universities May Be Prioritising Rankings Over Teaching Quality

Malaysian universities are increasingly emphasising PhD qualifications and publication records for hiring new academic staff, a trend driven by a Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) rule implemented two to three years ago. This focus on high H-indexes and publications is largely aimed at improving international rankings, such as those from QS and Times Higher Education, which in turn can attract more students, particularly from overseas, and yield significant monetary benefits for private institutions. However, this stringent adherence to academic credentials may inadvertently compromise the quality of teaching by overlooking skilled educators with master's degrees or those who excel in practical, non-publication-heavy disciplines.
Emphasis on PhDs and Publications for International Rankings

The requirement for new academic hires to possess a PhD and a strong publication record, often measured by their H-index, has become a near-necessity in most Malaysian universities. This policy, formalised by the MQA approximately two to three years ago, means that individuals without a relevant PhD might struggle to even secure an interview, regardless of their prior teaching experience. Private universities, in particular, have adopted the practice of requiring high publication indices as a strategic move to boost their standing in international university rankings.
Financial Incentives Tied to University Rankings

A higher number of academic staff with impressive publication records directly correlates with improved international rankings for universities. These rankings, in turn, are a significant factor in attracting a larger student intake, especially international students. Consequently, many Malaysian private universities actively promote their rankings, as these academic achievements have tangible financial implications, leading to increased revenue and enrolment.
Potential Detriment to Teaching Quality

The strong emphasis on academic credentials and publication output for hiring may lead to an overemphasis on these metrics at the expense of effective teaching. Many proficient lecturers and educators possess the ability to communicate complex subjects clearly, inspire students, and provide dedicated support, yet they may only hold a master's degree or have a limited publication history. The article questions the rationale behind excluding master's degree holders from interviews for bachelor's degree courses, even when they demonstrate proven dedication and skill.
Disconnect in Certain Disciplines

In fields such as journalism, video production, teaching, and graphic design, the act of publishing in top-tier academic journals is not always a reliable indicator of professional excellence. Practitioners in these areas are often highly engaged in their fields and may lack the time or inclination to produce the lengthy manuscripts typically required for academic publication. This disconnect raises questions about whether the current hiring criteria adequately assess the skills and contributions of professionals in these practice-oriented disciplines.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Are Malaysian universities prioritising rankings over teaching quality?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends