Are new villages comparable to Felda schemes in inclusivity debates?

Question

Accepted Answer

New Villages and Felda Schemes: A Comparison in Inclusivity Debates

Umno has drawn a parallel between new villages and Felda land schemes in discussions regarding inclusivity, asserting that just as new villages are designated for the Chinese community, Felda land should remain the preserve of the Malay community. This comparison arises in the context of Umno's concern over proposals to open up Felda settlers' schemes and Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) admissions to all races. The party argues that such proposals disregard the specific historical contexts and community rights associated with these institutions.
Felda Schemes as Malay Community Rights

Umno's stance emphasizes that Felda land represents the sole land ownership for many poor Malay settlers who do not own property in their home villages. The party views these schemes as a fundamental right of the Malay community, akin to the existence of new villages for the Chinese community. This perspective frames the inclusivity debate as a balancing act where the established rights of different ethnic groups must be respected in a multi-racial nation.
New Villages as a Precedent for Community Designation

The argument for maintaining the exclusivity of Felda schemes is buttressed by Umno's reference to new villages, which are understood to exist for the Chinese community. This analogy suggests that certain community-specific resources or designations are accepted practices in Malaysia. Umno contends that in pursuing a 'Malaysian Malaysia,' the rights of all communities should be acknowledged and preserved, implying that opening up Felda schemes would infringe upon established Malay rights.
Historical Sacrifices and Inclusivity Concerns

Umno further highlights that the Malay community has previously made concessions in the interest of inclusivity, citing the allowance of a 10 per cent quota for non-Malay students at Mara Junior Science Colleges (MRSMs). This historical point is used to underscore Umno's argument that while the Malay community has been amenable to certain forms of inclusivity, the current pressures on Felda and UiTM are seen as exceeding acceptable boundaries and potentially undermining the rights of the Malay community.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Are new villages comparable to Felda schemes in inclusivity debates?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends