Are practitioner-oriented fields disadvantaged by current hiring criteria?

Question

Accepted Answer

Practitioner-Oriented Disciplines May Be Disadvantaged by Current Academic Hiring Criteria

Current hiring practices in many Malaysian universities, which heavily favour candidates with PhDs and a significant publication record, may inadvertently disadvantage individuals in practitioner-oriented disciplines. These fields, such as journalism, video production, teaching, and graphic design, often value extensive practical experience and demonstrable skill over academic output, meaning top professionals in these areas might not meet the stringent publication benchmarks. This emphasis risks overlooking highly competent individuals whose expertise lies in active practice rather than scholarly writing.
The Nature of Practitioner-Oriented Disciplines

Practitioner-oriented disciplines are fields where success and expertise are primarily defined by the ability to perform a craft or service effectively and innovatively. In journalism, for instance, a seasoned reporter's value is in their ability to break stories and produce compelling content, not necessarily in writing academic papers about reporting techniques. Similarly, a talented graphic designer or video producer demonstrates their skill through their portfolio of completed projects and their impact on clients or audiences. These roles traditionally assess proficiency through practical application, creativity, and real-world results, rather than through academic publications.
The Conflict with Academic Hiring Standards

The academic hiring model, particularly the increasing requirement for PhDs and a high H-index (a measure of publication output), creates a disconnect for those in practitioner-oriented fields. Professionals who are deeply engaged in their active practice – whether teaching, creating media, or designing – may find they lack the time, inclination, or even the necessity to pursue and publish academic manuscripts. For these individuals, their professional achievements and reputation within their industry serve as their primary credentials. Consequently, a focus on academic publication metrics may exclude individuals who are otherwise highly qualified and could bring invaluable real-world experience to university classrooms.
Potential Impact on Educational Quality

If universities continue to prioritise academic publication records over demonstrated practical expertise in fields like journalism or graphic design, the quality of education in these areas could be affected. Students in these disciplines benefit immensely from instructors who are not only knowledgeable about theory but are also actively contributing to and excelling within their professional fields. An overemphasis on academic credentials might lead to hiring individuals who are proficient researchers but lack the up-to-date, hands-on experience that practitioners can offer. This could result in a curriculum that is more theoretical than practical, potentially leaving graduates less prepared for the demands of their chosen professions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Are practitioner-oriented fields disadvantaged by current hiring criteria?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends