Can BN and PH keep the Unity Government intact until GE16?

Question

Accepted Answer

Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Harapan May Need to Separate Electoral Paths Before GE16

The Unity Government's stability, while providing a measure of calm after years of political turbulence, faces potential divergence between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Harapan (PH) as the 16th General Election (GE16) approaches. Electoral politics operates on different principles than governance, and the cooperation seen in office does not guarantee continued alignment at the ballot box. Several structural factors suggest that BN and PH may find it necessary to pursue separate electoral strategies.
Electoral Strategy and the Loss of Surprise

A primary consideration is the strategic advantage of surprise in elections. If BN maintains a close political understanding with PAS while remaining part of the Unity Government, it could diminish PH's ability to present a coordinated and unexpected campaign. PAS, under Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang, has maintained a consistent political approach, appealing primarily to its existing base without significant moderation. This dynamic could allow opposition parties greater insight into the Unity Government's campaign machinery and calculations, potentially weakening PH's electoral effectiveness.
The Importance of East Malaysian Support

The political landscape of Sabah and Sarawak represents another critical factor. These states are indispensable to any coalition aiming to form the federal government due to their parliamentary strength. Historically, Christian communities in Sabah and Sarawak have used the word "Allah" in their worship, and attempts to restrict this practice have caused unease in East Malaysia. Any perception of BN aligning more closely with a PAS-led political framework risks alienating leaders and voters in Sabah and Sarawak, whose political culture emphasizes moderation, constitutional federalism, and religious harmony, differing from PAS's ideological focus. Pakatan Harapan's ability to form a governing majority after GE16 relies on continued cooperation with these East Malaysian states.
Political Psychology and Leadership Dynamics

The third challenge stems from political psychology, particularly PAS's tendency to project itself as essential to its partners' electoral success, suggesting a desire for dominance. This narrative could create pressure for BN to acknowledge PAS as the leading partner, a scenario Umno is unlikely to accept. Such a shift could force Deputy Prime Minister I Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi into a difficult position, balancing commitments to the Unity Government and BN's own political identity against potential overtures towards PAS. Conversely, reaffirming commitment to the Unity Government and moderate politics could enhance his role as a bridge-builder. In contrast, Deputy Prime Minister II Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof of Sarawak embodies a consensus-oriented political tradition that aligns with East Malaysian priorities of moderation and interfaith accommodation. As Sabah and Sarawak gain strategic importance, leaders like Fadillah may see their influence grow, particularly if Zahid struggles to reconcile BN's relationships with PAS and PH.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Can BN and PH keep the Unity Government intact until GE16?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends