Can cinema entrance glamour extend to the exit experience?

Question

Accepted Answer

Cinema entrance glamour cannot realistically extend to the exit experience as described in Malaysian cinemas, because exits are routinely routed through cramped, poorly lit “tunnels” and narrow stairs rather than the front-door experience.

The complaint centres on what happens after the credits roll: patrons are directed away from the front exit and instead follow left or right “Exit doors” that lead into crowded corridors. The exit route is described as poorly ventilated, featuring multiple flights of very narrow, poorly lit stairs, with minimal lighting and often no air-conditioning, creating an experience that the writer calls jarring and unsafe-feeling. This is contrasted with the entrance, which is described as glamorous, with lounges, carpets, lights, posters, screens, and staff smiles.
Patrons are steered away from the front exit into “tunnels”
The described flow starts when hall lights come on and everyone stands to leave, but the front exit is blocked by staff who stop people from going out that way. Instead, patrons must head toward exit doors on the left or right at the bottom of the theatre-style hall, beginning a “fun” the writer says they wish they did not have to experience. The route is characterised as crowded and usually poorly ventilated.
The exit corridors are portrayed as narrow, dim, and uncomfortable
The exit experience is repeatedly framed around stairs and lighting: patrons walk down numerous flights of very narrow, poorly lit stairs. Along the way, the writer notes uncertainty about where the exit to the mall is, and describes the corridors as resembling secret escape tunnels in popular imagination. The writer also contrasts the lack of comfort features, describing plain cement floors, minimal or no lighting, and heavy-set doors.
The entrance is described as “Ooh La La” while the exit lacks basic comforts
At the front, the writer lists a range of features that create an upbeat atmosphere, including lounges, carpets, lights, “Ooh La La” vibes, service and smiles, popcorn, attractive posters, screens, and fancy doors. By the time patrons exit, the writer says it is practically the opposite: no fancy lights, sometimes barely any lighting, no carpeting, often no air-con, and no smiles, with only old posters and trash cans. Even the doors are described as heavy and a source of concern because they may swing back and hit someone behind.
The writer questions why the exit experience cannot match the entrance
The writer asks why cinemas cannot allow people to leave via the front door or add decoration along the exit corridors, arguing that the current setup undermines the movie-going experience. The complaint is tied to perceived discomfort and risk, including a reference to “four flights of narrow stairs” and a stated “20 per cent chance of falling,” alongside mention of ticket prices such as RM25 and the presence of elderly patrons. The overall point is that the exit is framed as an unsafe-feeling finale that does not align with the glamour promised at the entrance.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Can cinema entrance glamour extend to the exit experience?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

3

0

0

Share with friends