Can salary increments after 60 affect termination validity?

Question

Accepted Answer

Salary Increments After 60 Can Impact Termination Validity

Salary increments and continued employment beyond the statutory retirement age of 60 can significantly affect the validity of a subsequent termination based on age. An employer's actions, such as granting pay raises and maintaining EPF contributions after an employee has passed the retirement age, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to the employment relationship. This conduct can be interpreted as a waiver of the employer's right to later invoke retirement age as a sole justification for dismissal.
Continued Employment Beyond Retirement Age

In Malaysia, the statutory retirement age is set at 60, but employers are not mandated to terminate employees upon reaching this age. A recent Industrial Court case highlighted that an employer who voluntarily allows an employee to continue working for several years past 60 cannot later use retirement age as a basis for termination. The employer in this instance had retained a Project Manager for years after he turned 60 without altering his employment terms.
Employer Conduct Demonstrates Intent to Continue Employment

The employer's actions post-retirement age strongly indicated an intention to continue the employment relationship, effectively waiving their right to enforce retirement at 60. This was evidenced by the continued payment of salary and benefits, the granting of salary increments, and a revision of the employee’s EPF contribution rate from 4 per cent to 8 per cent after he had passed the age of 60. These actions were fundamentally inconsistent with a stance that the employment had concluded upon reaching the retirement age.
Termination Requires Just Cause and Procedural Fairness

When an employer has continued to employ an individual beyond the retirement age, any subsequent termination cannot rely solely on age. Instead, the dismissal must be supported by a just cause and adhere to proper procedural fairness. The Industrial Court also noted that allegations raised only after a termination notice has been issued are generally not admissible as grounds to retrospectively justify the dismissal, as employers are typically bound by the reasons stated at the outset.
Importance of Clear Contractual Terms

For employers, it is prudent to address retirement arrangements explicitly through clear contractual clauses or well-defined post-retirement employment terms. Documenting whether employment continues on a fixed-term basis, a renewable arrangement, or another revised structure can reduce uncertainty and better protect the employer's position in potential disputes. Furthermore, ensuring all grounds for dismissal are properly investigated and articulated from the beginning is crucial, as introducing new reasons later may undermine credibility.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Can salary increments after 60 affect termination validity?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends