Can the Court of Appeal review its own decision on Peter Anthony?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Court of Appeal Can Review Its Own Decision on Peter Anthony

Former Sabah Infrastructure Development Minister Datuk Peter Anthony has initiated a review of the Court of Appeal's decision that upheld his three-year jail sentence and RM50,000 fine. This legal process, filed on March 14, seeks to have the conviction and sentence, previously confirmed by the Court of Appeal on March 4, set aside. Anthony has also requested the cancellation of the detention warrant issued to Kajang Prison.
Filing for Review of Conviction and Sentence

Through his legal representatives, Peter Anthony submitted a notice of motion accompanied by a supporting affidavit to the Court of Appeal. This filing specifically requests the court to review and annul the judgment delivered on March 4, which confirmed his conviction and the imposed three-year prison term under Section 468 of the Penal Code. The review application is a procedural mechanism available to challenge prior judicial decisions under specific circumstances.
Seeking Cancellation of Detention Warrant

In conjunction with the review of his conviction, Anthony is also seeking the cancellation of the detention warrant dated March 4. This warrant, directed to Kajang Prison, mandates his incarceration. By requesting its cancellation, he aims to prevent or halt the execution of the sentence pending the outcome of the review proceedings.
Previous Appeals and Fine Payment

This review application follows previous unsuccessful appeals. On April 19, 2023, Anthony appealed to the Court of Appeal to set aside his conviction and sentence, but this was dismissed. Prior to that, the Kuala Lumpur High Court had also upheld the Sessions Court's decision on April 18, 2023. It is noted that Anthony has already settled the RM50,000 fine.
Background of the Forgery Charge

The conviction stems from a charge of forging a letter from the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) on June 9, 2014, with fraudulent intent. The alleged offence occurred between June 13 and August 21, 2014. If found guilty under Section 468 of the Penal Code, the maximum penalty includes seven years imprisonment and a fine. Case management for this review is scheduled for March 26 before the Deputy Registrar of the Court of Appeal.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Can the Court of Appeal review its own decision on Peter Anthony?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends