Could computers and laptops be treated as gaming machines?

Question

Accepted Answer

Computers and Laptops Can Be Considered Gaming Machines Under the Common Gaming Houses Act 1953

The Court of Appeal has affirmed that computers and laptops can be classified as "gaming machines" under the Common Gaming Houses Act 1953, establishing that online gambling activities conducted using such devices are indeed offences under the legislation. This ruling solidifies the High Court's earlier finding that the physical presence of traditional gambling equipment is not a prerequisite for an operation to be considered a common gaming house. The court upheld the convictions and sentences of the appellants, with adjustments made to their original penalties.
Online Gambling Falls Under Existing Legislation

The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal of Roseaini Johor and Rashid Mahmud, upholding the legal interpretation that online gambling constitutes an offence under the Common Gaming Houses Act 1953. The judges agreed with the High Court's determination that the law does not mandate the physical presence of gambling equipment on the premises to constitute a common gaming house. This decision means that operations facilitating online gambling, even without traditional machines like roulette wheels, are subject to prosecution under the Act.
Previous Convictions and Sentence Adjustments

In 2020, Roseaini Johor was initially sentenced to five months in prison and fined RM10,000 for managing online gambling activities using computers and laptops. Rashid Mahmud received a one-month prison sentence and a RM3,000 fine for engaging in online gambling with a laptop. The High Court later adjusted Roseaini's sentence to a RM5,000 fine while upholding her prison term, and set aside Rashid's prison sentence, increasing his fine to RM5,000. The Court of Appeal has now further modified Roseaini's sentence to four months and three weeks imprisonment, along with a RM5,000 fine, while Rashid was fined RM5,000.
Interpretation of "Gaming Machines" and Technological Advancement

During the proceedings, the Deputy Public Prosecutor argued that computers and laptops should be considered "gaming machines" as defined within Act 289 of the Common Gaming Houses Act. This argument emphasized that the Act is applicable to sophisticated equipment, keeping pace with technological advancements. The court accepted this interpretation, concluding that premises used for online computer gambling, irrespective of the absence of physical gambling apparatus, fall within the legal definition of a "common gaming house."

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Could computers and laptops be treated as gaming machines?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends