Did Line Clear have a valid court order for demolition stay?

Question

Accepted Answer

Line Clear's Claim of Demolition Stay Lacks Documented Proof

The operator of the popular Penang nasi kandar outlet, Line Clear, has claimed to have obtained a stay of execution against the Penang Municipal Council's (MPPP) demolition order. However, this claim has not been substantiated by any official court documents. The operator's lawyer stated that the High Court had granted the order, but a sealed copy was unavailable at the time, with plans to secure it later.
Stay of Execution Claimed by Operator

Abdul Hamid Seeni Pakir, the operator of Line Clear, asserted that he had secured a stay of execution against the MPPP's demolition order from the Penang High Court. This claim was made in the context of a scheduled demolition of the stall, which ultimately did not proceed as planned. The Penang Municipal Council had initially intended to take enforcement action against the unlicensed outlet.
Lawyer Cites Court Order Granted in Chambers

According to Abdul Hamid's lawyer, Md Yusuf Md Idris, High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah had granted the stay of execution order in chambers. Despite this assertion, Abdul Hamid reportedly did not possess any court documents to validate the stay. The lawyer indicated that obtaining a sealed copy of the order was not possible immediately as the court's counter was closed, with plans to retrieve the papers on February 2.
Absence of Sealed Court Documents

The lack of a sealed court order presents a significant gap in substantiating Line Clear's claim. While the lawyer stated the order was granted, the inability to produce official documentation leaves the validity of the stay of execution unconfirmed. Typically, a sealed court order serves as the definitive proof of a judicial decision, providing legal standing for its enforcement.
Background of Enforcement Action

The MPPP had previously seized tables and chairs from Line Clear's premises on January 19, citing operations without a licence since 2015. Abdul Hamid had admitted to operating without a licence since taking over the business in 2008, but claimed a lack of notice or explanation from the MPPP. The stall operates on a rotation basis among four cousins, with licences issued annually.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did Line Clear have a valid court order for demolition stay?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends