Did Marcos and Xi agree that geopolitical issues should not define bilateral ties?

Question

Accepted Answer

Marcos and Xi Agreed Geopolitical Issues Should Not Define Bilateral Ties

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. met with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Apec Summit in San Francisco, where both leaders agreed that geopolitical problems should not be the defining element of their countries' relationship. President Marcos sought mechanisms to de-escalate tensions in the South China Sea and expressed concerns over recent incidents involving Chinese and Philippine vessels, including a collision, while also highlighting the difficulties faced by Filipino fishermen.
Agreement to Prioritise Other Aspects of Bilateral Relations

President Marcos conveyed to reporters that he and President Xi found common ground in their belief that geopolitical challenges should not overshadow the broader aspects of the relationship between the Philippines and China. This understanding suggests a mutual desire to prevent ongoing disputes from dictating the entirety of their interactions.
Discussion on South China Sea Tensions

During their meeting, President Marcos raised specific concerns regarding incidents in the South China Sea, citing a collision between vessels and the broader issue of Filipino fishermen being prevented from accessing traditional fishing grounds within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. He stated that efforts were made to develop mechanisms aimed at reducing these tensions.
China's Expansive Claims in the South China Sea

China's claims over the South China Sea encompass nearly the entire body of water, a position that stands in contrast to a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which invalidated Beijing's extensive claims. The persistent assertion of these claims has been a significant source of friction in regional maritime affairs.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did Marcos and Xi agree that geopolitical issues should not define bilateral ties?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends