Did Packer’s trading updates amount to de facto management control?

Question

Accepted Answer

Packer’s trading updates were not shown to amount to de facto management control in the evidence presented so far
James Packer told the New South Wales inquiry that he requested frequent trading updates from at least November 2018 through February 2019 and that he gave orders about Crown Resorts’ running while not holding a board or operational role since March 2018. However, the information presented does not definitively establish that these communications met the legal threshold for “de facto management control” under Australian corporate law. The inquiry record described his statements and emails, but it did not provide a definitive legal finding tying those actions to de facto management control.
What Packer said he did from late 2018 to early 2019
Packer acknowledged requesting frequent trading updates for a period covering at least November 2018 through February 2019. He also testified that he gave orders relating to how Crown Resorts was run during that time. This was presented alongside his concession that he had not held a board or operational role since March 2018.
What the emails showed about his involvement
An email read out to the inquiry in 2019, sent to then chief financial officer Ken Barton, urged achievement of Crown’s financial year 2020 plan, using the line: “you have had your heads in the sands this year. Make sure, for your own sake, we achieve the financial year 2020 plan.” Another November 2018 email to then chairman John Alexander included permission to cut costs and the message: “I’m over being Captain Good Guy to everyone. Go hard, you have my blessing.” Packer denied that the 2019 email was a threat and said that, as a large shareholder, he believed he could communicate that way.
Why the inquiry evidence did not settle the “de facto” question
While the record describes Packer’s shareholder communications and instructions, it does not state a legal conclusion that they constituted de facto management control. The coverage also notes that the material did not definitively determine whether his actions amounted to management control in the legal sense. A fully supported answer would require the inquiry’s legal analysis and the specific definition used in the Australian corporate-law context.
The broader context of Packer’s role during the period
Packer’s evidence also touched on turmoil during 2016, when 16 Crown staff were jailed in China for violating anti-gambling laws, and he said he stepped back from public view for personal reasons. He continued to testify via videolink and was scheduled to continue giving evidence the next day. Within that wider account, the trading updates and orders were part of what he acknowledged doing despite lacking a board or operational position.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did Packer’s trading updates amount to de facto management control?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends