Did PH break its promise by voting against Sosma?

Question

Accepted Answer

Pakatan Harapan's Vote on Sosma and the Memorandum of Understanding

Pakatan Harapan's (PH) recent parliamentary vote against the extension of a Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) provision has sparked debate regarding a potential breach of its memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the government. While some government figures, specifically from Umno, argue that the opposition coalition violated the spirit of the agreement, PH representatives maintain that their vote does not impact the MoU's validity. The core of the disagreement lies in the interpretation of the MoU's clauses concerning the opposition's role and support for government initiatives.
Umno's Stance on the MoU Violation

Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan has called for the government to terminate the MoU with PH, citing the rejection of the Sosma motion as clear evidence of PH's untrustworthiness and a pattern of breaking promises. He argued that any cooperation should cease before the MoU's scheduled expiry in July. Umno minister Tan Sri Annuar Musa further elaborated on this point, asserting that PH had contravened Article 3.3 (b) of the MoU, which he contended obliges the opposition to back government-proposed motions. The motion in question, seeking to extend sub-section 4(5) of Sosma for another five years, was defeated by a margin of 86 votes against to 84 in favour, with 50 MPs absent.
Pakatan Harapan's Counter-Argument

In contrast, newly appointed DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke has refuted the assertion that voting against the Sosma extension constitutes a breach of the MoU. Loke stated that such a vote would not affect the agreement. This perspective aligns with Article 9.1 of the MoU itself, which acknowledges that the opposition is not precluded from fulfilling its crucial check-and-balance function. This implies that the opposition retains the prerogative to scrutinise and vote against government proposals, even those presented as government motions, without necessarily jeopardising the broader political understanding.
The Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012

The Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, commonly known as Sosma, is a piece of legislation enacted to address national security threats. The specific provision under scrutiny, sub-section 4(5), pertains to the powers granted under the Act, and its five-year extension required parliamentary approval. The rejection of this motion means that the specific measures or powers detailed within this subsection will not continue to be enforced beyond their current term, raising questions about the government's ability to maintain certain security frameworks and the political implications of such parliamentary dissent.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did PH break its promise by voting against Sosma?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends