Did prosecutors collude with Nissan to oust Ghosn?

Question

Accepted Answer

Ghosn Alleges Prosecutor-Nissan Collusion in Bid to Dismiss Charges

Ex-Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn's legal team has submitted filings to the Tokyo District Court alleging that Japanese prosecutors colluded with Nissan and subcontracted their investigation to Nissan employees aiming to remove Ghosn. These documents claim that the prosecution's case is politically motivated, fundamentally flawed, and contradicted by evidence, arguing for the dismissal of the financial misconduct charges against him. Ghosn maintains his innocence and asserts that the allegations stem from internal resentment over his plans for closer integration between Nissan and its alliance partner, Renault.
Claims of a "Secret Task Force" and Collusion

The legal filings detail the alleged creation of a "secret task force" within Nissan, purportedly established to fabricate allegations of wrongdoing against Ghosn as a means to force his removal. Ghosn's lawyers contend that this internal effort was supported by collusion involving prosecutors, officials from Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), and Nissan executives. This alleged conspiracy, according to the defence, was driven by opposition to Ghosn's strategy of further integrating Nissan and Renault, which was perceived as a threat to the autonomy of a major Japanese industrial entity.
Allegations of Politically Motivated Prosecution

Ghosn's defence team argues that the prosecution against him was inherently compromised from its inception due to its political motivations. The filings assert that the evidence gathered demonstrates a pattern of illegal misconduct by prosecutors, which has rendered the entire case fundamentally flawed. This alleged misconduct, they claim, includes the outsourcing of investigative duties to Nissan employees who had a vested interest in Ghosn's downfall, thereby tainting the integrity of the proceedings.
Opposition to Nissan-Renault Integration as a Motive

Central to Ghosn's defence is the assertion that the accusations against him are a direct consequence of resistance to his strategic vision for Nissan. His lawyers claim that his proposals for a deeper integration of Nissan with the French automaker Renault generated significant opposition within Nissan, leading to a concerted effort to remove him from his leadership position. This internal opposition, they allege, subsequently drew in government officials from METI, who then allegedly collaborated with prosecutors and Nissan executives to achieve Ghosn's ousting.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did prosecutors collude with Nissan to oust Ghosn?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends