Did the couple understand the written agreement for the loan?

Question

Accepted Answer

The couple indicated they did not fully comprehend the written agreement for the loan.

The couple stated they were "unsure what was written in the agreement" when they signed it. This written document, which was witnessed by a police inspector, concerned a RM3,500 loan taken to settle traffic summonses. The agreement was made with Nurhidayu Badrol Hisham, a woman the couple had not previously met but trusted due to her connection with their neighbour.
Lack of Comprehension Regarding the Agreement

R. Nages Rao and K. Kanagavalli, the parents in question, admitted to signing a written contract without fully understanding its contents. This lack of clarity was particularly significant as the agreement was tied to the temporary care of their eight-month-old son, Sai Karthi, following the loan disbursement. Their desperation for funds led them to proceed with the arrangement despite their uncertainty about the specific terms outlined in the written document.
Verbal Understanding Versus Written Terms

While the couple verbally agreed that their child would be returned within two days, this understanding appears to have been distinct from the written terms. They reported that Nurhidayu failed to return their son after the agreed-upon period, stating she would only do so upon full repayment of the loan. This discrepancy highlights a potential conflict between their verbal assurances and the legally binding nature of the signed written agreement.
Circumstances Leading to the Agreement

The couple sought the loan to cover RM2,800 in unpaid traffic summonses accumulated by Nages Rao. They borrowed RM3,500 from Nurhidayu, who was introduced through a neighbour named Rani. Nurhidayu's stated affection for the child, citing his cuteness, was presented as a reason for her wanting to care for him for the two-day period.
Concerns Over the Child's Welfare

Following Nurhidayu's refusal to return the child, Kanagavalli expressed fears that their son might be adopted. She also mentioned a conversation with Nurhidayu's father-in-law, who allegedly claimed that the child's name had already been changed on his birth certificate, though this remains unconfirmed. The couple has since lodged a police report regarding the incident.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did the couple understand the written agreement for the loan?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends