Did the defence use the ledger to support selective prosecution claims?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Defence Utilised the Ledger to Bolster Claims of Selective Prosecution

The defence team for Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi employed a ledger, prepared by Ultra Kirana Sdn Bhd's (UKSB) former administrative manager David Tan Siong Sun, to support their argument of selective prosecution. This ledger documented cash payments made by UKSB to various politicians, government officials, and Ahmad Zahid himself. While the defence did not deny the ledger's existence and sought to identify other prominent individuals named within it, they ultimately failed to challenge its authenticity or the codenames used for Ahmad Zahid.
Ledger Authenticity and Purpose

The ledger in question was meticulously maintained by David Tan Siong Sun for the explicit purpose of recording cash transactions made by UKSB. These entries detailed payments to a range of individuals, including politicians and government staff, as well as Ahmad Zahid. The defence's strategy involved using this document to suggest that other high-profile figures were also recipients of funds, thereby underpinning their claim that Ahmad Zahid was being singled out unfairly.
Validation of Witness Testimonies

By not challenging the ledger's authenticity or the references to Ahmad Zahid, the defence's actions inadvertently validated the testimonies provided by three key prosecution witnesses. These witnesses had previously testified regarding Ahmad Zahid's alleged acceptance of monthly cash payments from UKSB. The contents of the ledger served to corroborate and strengthen the evidence presented by these individuals.
Corroboration from Prosecution Witnesses

The testimonies of former UKSB directors Wan Quoris Shah Wan Abdul Ghani and Harry Lee Vui Khiun, along with David Tan Siong Sun himself, were found to be corroborated by the ledger. Lee had previously detailed monthly cash payments in Singapore dollars received by Ahmad Zahid between 2014 and 2018, which included sponsored overseas trips. The ledger’s entries provided a factual basis that bolstered these accounts, reinforcing the prosecution's case.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did the defence use the ledger to support selective prosecution claims?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends