Did the High Court find Zuraida’s bond breach case hinges on contract validity?

Question

Accepted Answer

High Court Ruled Zuraida's Bond Was a Valid Contract in Breach Case

The High Court determined that the validity of the bond was central to the case involving Datuk Zuraida Kamaruddin's alleged breach of contract with Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). Justice Datuk Akhtar Tahir found the bond to be a valid and binding agreement, rejecting Zuraida's claims of duress. This ruling directly addressed the core of PKR's lawsuit, which sought RM10 million from Zuraida for violating the terms of this bond.
Bond Deemed a Valid and Binding Agreement

The High Court's decision hinged on its finding that the bond signed by Datuk Zuraida Kamaruddin on April 25, 2018, constituted a legally valid contract. This agreement stipulated that Zuraida would pay PKR RM10 million should certain conditions be met, such as resigning from the party after winning an election on its ticket. The court's assessment established that Zuraida was contractually obligated by the terms of this bond.
Zuraida's Defence of Duress Was Found Baseless

Datuk Zuraida Kamaruddin had contended that she was compelled to sign the bond under duress or coercion to secure her candidacy for the 14th General Election in 2018. However, Justice Datuk Akhtar Tahir dismissed this defence, stating it lacked foundation. The court concluded that Zuraida's own actions led to the termination of her membership, thereby triggering the bond's stipulations.
Lawsuit Claimed RM10 Million for Breach of Bond

PKR's lawsuit, filed by secretary-general Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail on September 28, 2020, sought the RM10 million sum from Zuraida specifically for an alleged breach of the bond. The party claimed Zuraida had agreed to pay this amount under the bond's terms and conditions, which included events like leaving PKR or joining other parties post-election victory. The High Court's RM10 million award to PKR directly reflected the financial claim based on the bond's breach.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did the High Court find Zuraida’s bond breach case hinges on contract validity?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends