Did Wong’s claims ignore DAP’s number of full minister appointments?

Question

Accepted Answer

Wong's Claims on Cabinet Appointments Were Contested Based on DAP's Ministerial Representation

Wong Kah Woh's assertion that Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was unfair and disregarded Pakatan Harapan (PH) party views in Cabinet selections has been met with criticism, particularly regarding the number of full ministerial appointments allocated to the DAP. Critics argue that Wong's claims overlooked the fact that DAP secured the second-highest number of positions within the Cabinet, with five full ministers appointed, only one less than PKR.
DAP Holds Second-Highest Number of Full Ministerial Posts

The distribution of full ministerial roles within the Pakatan Harapan government has become a point of contention. Wong Kah Woh, in his critique of the Cabinet selections, implied a disproportionate allocation of positions, specifically highlighting the non-appointment of certain DAP leaders as full ministers. However, Adhif Syan Abdullah, the PPBM Youth Selangor chief, countered this by stating that the DAP received the second-highest number of appointments after PKR. Specifically, the DAP was allocated five full ministerial positions, a figure only surpassed by PKR.
Appointment Numbers and Racial Composition Considerations

Adhif Syan Abdullah further contended that the Cabinet appointments were made fairly, taking into account the racial composition of Malaysia. He pointed out that among the 26 ministers sworn in, five were from the Chinese community, which includes DAP members. Other communities represented included three from the Indian community, one Kadazandusun, one Lun Bawang, and 16 Malays. This breakdown was presented as evidence of a balanced approach to ministerial representation across different ethnic groups.
Proportionality Argument and Internal Grievances

Wong Kah Woh's argument against the Cabinet composition was based on proportionality relative to the number of parliamentary seats won by each component party. He stated that the DAP secured 42 out of the 113 seats represented by Pakatan Harapan, suggesting that the ministerial appointments did not reflect this electoral success. Wong also suggested that the Prime Minister's decisions disregarded input from the leadership of the component parties, which he described as a sign of disrespect. Conversely, Adhif advised that any dissatisfaction regarding Cabinet appointments should have been raised through internal PH channels, as the selection of ministers is ultimately the prerogative of the Prime Minister.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Did Wong’s claims ignore DAP’s number of full minister appointments?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends