Has Rosmah formally requested the return of seized valuables?

Question

Accepted Answer

No Formal Request Has Been Made by Rosmah for the Return of Seized Valuables

The Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun, has confirmed that no formal request has been submitted by Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor or any other party for the return of valuables that were impounded during investigations related to 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). This statement clarifies the current status of any potential claims for the seized items, which include a significant quantity of jewellery and handbags.
Police Await Formal Procedure for Property Claims

IGP Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun stated that as of the current date, the police have not received any official written requests or appeals concerning the return of the seized belongings. He indicated that any individual or entity claiming ownership over these impounded assets, which are valued in the millions of ringgit, must adhere to legal procedures. This involves filing a formal request for the return of their properties, a process that the police will then address in accordance with the law.
Third-Party Lawsuit Filed for Jewellery Return

Despite the absence of a formal request from Rosmah herself, a Lebanese company named Global Royalty Trading SAL has initiated legal action. The company filed a lawsuit seeking the return of 44 pieces of jewellery, valued at US$14.79 million (RM59.8 million), which were reportedly sent to Rosmah in February. This legal filing asserts the company's ownership of these specific items, which include diamond necklaces, earrings, rings, bracelets, and a tiara.
Rosmah Acknowledged Receipt and Subsequent Impoundment

Documents related to the lawsuit indicate that Rosmah, in a letter dated May 22, acknowledged receiving the 44 pieces of jewellery. However, she stated that the items were no longer in her possession because they had been impounded by the authorities. The Lebanese jeweller's lawsuit seeks a court declaration that the 44 seized pieces are their property and must be returned, or alternatively, an order for Rosmah to pay an equivalent sum based on the jewellery's value.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Has Rosmah formally requested the return of seized valuables?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends