How can bipartisan support for the Anti-Party Hopping Bill be strengthened?

Question

Accepted Answer

Strengthening Bipartisan Support for the Anti-Party Hopping Bill

The Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas) has expressed concern over potential further delays in tabling the Anti-Party Hopping Bill, a key component of the government-opposition Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Ideas suggests that the government utilise any delay to enhance bipartisan support through more inclusive consultations with think tanks and civil society organisations (CSOs), alongside thorough deliberation on the draft Bill to address potential gaps and counterproductive effects on democracy.
Inclusive Consultation and Deliberation

Ideas has urged the government to use the confirmed delay in tabling the Anti-Party Hopping Bill as an opportunity to broaden its consultation process. This includes engaging with think tanks and civil society organisations (CSOs) to ensure that a wider range of perspectives are considered. The institute stresses the importance of conducting meaningful and thorough deliberations on the draft Bill to identify and address any potential gaps before it is presented to Parliament.
Addressing Concerns on Definition and Freedom of Association

A significant concern raised by Ideas pertains to the definition of 'party hopping' within the Bill. They believe this definition may mirror concerns already held by some Members of Parliament (MPs). Furthermore, Ideas is apprehensive that excluding party-hopping from the constitutional freedom of association could establish a precedent for future exemptions, thereby jeopardising the fundamental right of Malaysians to form and join associations.
Conscience Vote and Parliamentary Debate

Echoing a suggestion from Prof Wong Chin Huat, Ideas advocates for the Anti-Party Hopping Bill to be subject to a conscience vote. This approach would allow MPs the freedom to vote according to their convictions, particularly during the committee stage where individual clauses are debated. Such a process, Ideas posits, is crucial for ensuring that MPs can express their concerns and engage in meaningful debates, with their views publicly recorded to foster trust in democratic institutions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How can bipartisan support for the Anti-Party Hopping Bill be strengthened?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends