How can the PSSC ensure genuine inclusivity beyond mere consultation?

Question

Accepted Answer

PSSC Can Ensure Genuine Inclusivity Through Substantive Engagement Beyond Consultations

The parliamentary special select committee (PSSC) can ensure genuine inclusivity in its review of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill 2026 by moving beyond superficial consultations and engaging with civil society organisations and other stakeholders in a substantive manner. This approach, welcomed by groups like the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Article 19, and C4 Centre, acknowledges that a meaningful review process requires deep and comprehensive participation. The referral of the Bill under Standing Order (SO) 54(1) of the Dewan Rakyat Standing Orders (DRSO) allows the PSSC to discuss the Bill's details, merits, and principles, providing a framework for such substantive engagement.
PSSC's Mandate to Discuss Bill's Principles and Details

The referral of the FOI Bill 2026 to a PSSC under SO 54(1) DRSO grants the committee a broad mandate. This specific provision, as outlined in SO 55(1) DRSO, empowers the PSSC not only to examine the finer points of the legislation but also to deliberate on its underlying merits and core principles. This is distinct from a committal after the second reading, which restricts the committee's scope primarily to the Bill's details. The pre-second reading committal therefore provides a crucial opportunity for a more thorough and foundational review, which is essential for achieving genuine inclusivity.
Civil Society Welcomes Referral but Emphasises Substantive Engagement

Civil society organisations, including CIJ, Article 19, and C4 Centre, have publicly welcomed the government's decision to refer the FOI Bill 2026 to a PSSC. While viewing the referral as a positive development, these groups have consistently stressed the necessity for the review process to be meaningful, transparent, and inclusive. Their joint statement underscores that consultations must involve civil society organisations and other stakeholders "in a substantive manner," indicating a desire for active participation rather than passive observation.
The Importance of Substantive Stakeholder Involvement

The call for consultations to be conducted in a "substantive manner" suggests that genuine inclusivity goes beyond mere information gathering. It implies a process where the input from civil society and other stakeholders is actively considered, debated, and potentially incorporated into the Bill's amendments. This requires a commitment from the PSSC to create an environment where diverse perspectives can be shared openly and where the committee demonstrates a willingness to adapt the legislation based on informed feedback, thereby ensuring the Bill truly reflects public interest.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How can the PSSC ensure genuine inclusivity beyond mere consultation?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends