How did MyIPO copyright registration of Hasan Azhari’s paper support his claim?

Question

Accepted Answer

MyIPO copyright registration helped Hasan Azhari support his ownership and validity claims in the “MADANI” number plates dispute

Hasan Azhari Hashim registered his “MADANI” number plates proposal paper with the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO) as a copyrighted work, and he relied on that registration to back his allegation that the JPJ director-general copied and used his proposal without authorisation. In court, he pointed to the registered work’s title, “Kertas Kerja Mewujudkan Nombor Plat Khas Kenderaan Bersiri Madani 1 Sehingga Madani 9999 Untuk Didaftarkan Di Malaysia,” as the specific copyrighted material at the centre of the case. The registration was presented as a key starting point for establishing that he was the rights holder of the proposal he said JPJ later used in its October 2024 “MADANI” poster and public bidding rollout.
Registration was tied to a specific copyrighted proposal title and content

Azhari’s MyIPO registration covered his proposal paper for “MADANI” plates, with the work explicitly titled around creating special vehicle number plates for serial numbers “Madani 1” through “Madani 9999” for registration in Malaysia. This matters because his infringement claim was not general; it was anchored to the particular proposal he said JPJ reproduced or closely resembled. By linking the copyright to that defined proposal, his claim could be framed around use of that registered work rather than an abstract idea.
It supported his position that he owned the copyrighted work

The dispute turned on whether JPJ used his copyrighted proposal without authorisation, which he alleged based on similarities between his poster from his copyrighted work and JPJ’s October 2024 poster. In such cases in Malaysia, a registered copyright is typically treated as prima facie evidence of ownership and validity in legal proceedings, meaning it provides an initial evidentiary basis for the claimant’s rights. With MyIPO registration in place, Azhari could present the court with documentation showing that the proposal he claimed was copied had been registered as a copyrighted work.
It shaped the burden-of-proof dynamic in the infringement allegation

Once Azhari produced the MyIPO registration for the proposal paper, the legal focus could shift to whether JPJ’s poster and rollout were sufficiently connected to the copyrighted work he claimed. In Malaysian copyright infringement proceedings, the burden of proof framework generally requires the claimant to establish the existence and relevance of the copyrighted work, while the defendant disputes infringement. Here, JPJ denied infringement and argued that its “MADANI” use and the special number plates concept were not new or registered in the way Azhari claimed, while also arguing that its proposal differed from the government rollout.
The court’s damages order indicates the registration was part of a successful rights claim

The High Court ordered the JPJ director-general to pay RM40,000 in compensation and RM25,000 in costs after Azhari sued over JPJ’s January 15, 2025 public bidding launch for the “MADANI” plates. Although the decision can be appealed within one month, the outcome shows that the court accepted Azhari’s infringement claim to the extent of granting statutory damages. In practice, MyIPO registration supported his case by providing an evidentiary foundation that the proposal he alleged was copied was a registered copyrighted work tied to his ownership assertion.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did MyIPO copyright registration of Hasan Azhari’s paper support his claim?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends