How did Rais Yatim justify the legality of the proclamation amidst an injunction?

Question

Accepted Answer

Rais Yatim Asserted Proclamation Followed Adat and Constitutional Law Despite Injunction

Rais Yatim asserted that the proclamation of Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar as the 12th Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan was conducted in accordance with the state's customary law (adat) and constitutional provisions, thereby justifying its legality. He stated that the process involved a royal address and fulfilled the established adat procedures. Furthermore, Rais contended that the rule of law, as defined by the Constitution, had been adhered to, enabling Tunku Nadzaruddin to freely exercise his duties as Ruler.
Adherence to State Customary Law and Royal Address

The proclamation ceremony, which took place in Alor Gajah, Melaka, was explicitly carried out following the state's adat. Rais Yatim highlighted that this adherence to customary practices was complemented by a royal address delivered during the event. The presence of key adat leaders, including Undang Jelebu Datuk Maarof Mat Rashad and Tunku Besar Tampin Tunku Syed Razman Tunku Syed Idrus Al-Qadri, alongside legal experts and adat officials, underscored the ceremonial and traditional significance of the proceedings.
Fulfillment of Constitutional and Adat Requirements

Rais Yatim maintained that the entire process satisfied both constitutional mandates and the intricate requirements of Negeri Sembilan's adat. He described the proceedings as having completed the "rigmarole of the Adat," suggesting that all necessary customary steps had been meticulously followed. This assertion aimed to establish that the proclamation was not merely a ceremonial event but a legally and traditionally sound appointment.
Questioning the Legality of Legislative Assembly Dissolution

In his justification, Rais Yatim also raised questions regarding the legality of the Negeri Sembilan Legislative Assembly's dissolution. He argued that Tunku Nadzaruddin had already been appointed Ruler by the Undang on April 19, predating the dissolution announced with the consent of Tuanku Muhriz, whom the state government recognises. Rais further pointed to Article 28 of the state constitution, which he claimed defines the Ruler to include the Undang, and alleged that these traditional leaders were not consulted regarding the assembly's dissolution.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did Rais Yatim justify the legality of the proclamation amidst an injunction?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends