How did Roger Ng allegedly abet Goldman Sachs in the 1MDB case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Roger Ng Allegedly Aided Goldman Sachs in 1MDB Bond Sales Through Omissions and False Statements

Roger Ng Chong Hwa, a former Goldman Sachs banker, is accused of abetting the bank in four instances related to the sale of guaranteed notes and bonds from a 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) subsidiary, totalling US$6.5 billion. The charges specifically allege that material facts were omitted and false statements were made during these transactions, thereby misleading investors. Ng has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Omission of Low Taek Jho's Role and Dealings in First Charge

In the first charge, Goldman Sachs International is accused of omitting material facts concerning the sale of US$1,750,000,000 in guaranteed notes maturing in 2022. These omissions included the significant role of Low Taek Jho as the principal controller and intermediary of 1MDB, the parent company of the issuing subsidiary, 1MDB Energy Limited. Furthermore, details of collaboration and option agreements between 1MDB Energy Limited and Aabar Investments PJS Limited, as well as an inter-guarantor agreement between 1MDB and IPIC, were allegedly not disclosed.
False Statement Regarding Use of Proceeds in Second Charge

The second charge focuses on a sale of US$3,000,000,000 in guaranteed notes maturing in 2023. It is alleged that Goldman Sachs International made an incorrect statement in the offering circular dated March 16, 2013. Specifically, the circular stated that the issuer would on-lend proceeds to ADMIC or use them to fund its investment in ADMIC, a joint venture between the issuer and Aabar. This statement is alleged to have been false or misleading regarding the actual use of the proceeds.
Omission of Key Intermediary Role and Dealings in Third Charge

Regarding the third charge, Goldman Sachs is alleged to have omitted material facts as the arranger for the sale of US$1,750,000,000 in guaranteed notes due 2022, issued by 1MDB Energy (Langat) Limited. These omissions reportedly included Low Taek Jho's position as the operator and key intermediary for 1MDB. Additionally, details of a collaboration agreement for credit enhancement and an option agreement between 1MDB Energy Holdings Limited and Aabar Investments PJS Limited were allegedly not fully disclosed.
Omission of Intermediary Role in Fourth Charge

The fourth charge mirrors aspects of the second, involving the sale of US$3,000,000,000 in notes due 2023 by 1MDB Global Investments Limited. Goldman Sachs International, acting as bookrunner and arranger, is accused of omitting material facts concerning Low Taek Jho's role as the operator and key intermediary for 1MDB. These omissions were deemed necessary to make certain statements in the offering circular dated March 16, 2013, related to the management and corporate governance of 1MDB.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did Roger Ng allegedly abet Goldman Sachs in the 1MDB case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends