How did the courts uphold the death sentence for the sawmill worker?

Question

Accepted Answer

Federal Court Upholds Death Sentence for Sawmill Worker Convicted of Murder and Rape

The Federal Court has dismissed the appeal of Mohammad Awari Ahmad, a former sawmill worker, upholding his death sentence for the murder of a nurse. The court found no errors in the decisions of the lower courts, concluding that the prosecution had successfully established the element of intent and presented strong evidence. Mohammad Awari was found guilty by the Kota Bharu High Court for the brutal act, which involved slashing the victim with a machete, raping her while she was bleeding, and stealing from her.
Unanimous Dismissal of Appeal

A three-member Federal Court panel, presided over by Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, unanimously dismissed Mohammad Awari's appeal against the death sentence. The court affirmed the conviction and sentence, finding the High Court's and Court of Appeal's decisions to be sound. This decision means Mohammad Awari will proceed to face the mandatory death penalty for the murder conviction.
Prosecution's Case on Intent and Brutality

During the proceedings, the prosecution detailed the extreme brutality of the crime, describing the act as "brutal, aggressive and vicious." The victim sustained eleven injuries to her neck and hands from a machete, and the prosecution argued that the severity of these wounds clearly indicated an intention to kill. Following the fatal assault, Mohammad Awari proceeded to rape the victim while she was still bleeding from her injuries.
Corroborating Evidence and Victim's Statement

The prosecution presented strong supporting evidence, including a note written by the victim before her death, which identified her attacker. The victim's husband returned home on March 1, 2015, to find his wife naked and covered with a blanket on the road in front of their house. She was subsequently taken to Gua Musang Hospital, where she succumbed to her injuries. The crime scene details, including the theft of RM200 and a mobile phone, further corroborated the prosecution's case.
Rejection of Culpable Homicide Defence

Mohammad Awari's defence had argued that he lacked the intention to kill and should therefore be convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. However, the Federal Court found that the element of intent was sufficiently established by the prosecution. The court's review of the appeal record indicated that the evidence presented was robust and directly supported the High Court's finding of murder, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the death sentence.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did the courts uphold the death sentence for the sawmill worker?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends