How did the judge rule on legal fees and damages?

Question

Accepted Answer

Judge Rules on Legal Fees and Damages in Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni Dispute

A New York judge has ruled that US actor Justin Baldoni must cover legal fees but will not be required to pay damages to his It Ends with Us co-star Blake Lively. This decision, issued on Friday, represents a partial resolution for Lively in the protracted legal conflict. The case involved a defamation suit initiated by Baldoni and his production company, which Lively had contended was a retaliatory action following her allegations of sexual harassment.
Legal Fees Awarded to Lively

The court's judgment stipulates that Justin Baldoni is liable for the legal costs incurred by Blake Lively. While the specifics of the settlement reached in May were not disclosed, this ruling addresses the financial aspects of the legal proceedings, indicating that Lively will be reimbursed for her expenses related to defending against the defamation claims.
Damages Dismissed for Baldoni's Claims

Federal judge Lewis Liman dismissed Baldoni's defamation and extortion claims against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds in June 2025. This dismissal means that Lively and Reynolds will not have to pay any damages to Baldoni or his production company, Wayfarer, as part of these specific legal actions.
Lively's Allegations and Counterclaims

Lively's initial complaint detailed accusations against Baldoni, including inappropriate discussions about his sex life and attempts to alter the film It Ends with Us to incorporate sex scenes not originally in the script. She further alleged that Baldoni engaged in a public relations campaign aimed at damaging her reputation. These claims formed part of the broader dispute that led to the legal back-and-forth.
Case Background and Film Performance

The legal battle stemmed from the production of the film It Ends with Us, which grossed over US$350 million (RM1.4 billion) globally in 2024. The film is based on Colleen Hoover's best-selling novel. While the pair settled their primary dispute in May, avoiding a trial, the judge's ruling on Friday addressed the outstanding issues of legal fees and damages, bringing a conclusion to the contentious legal proceedings.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did the judge rule on legal fees and damages?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends