How did the court link Shafie’s statements to interfering with the inquest?

Question

Accepted Answer

Court Found Shafie's Remarks Could Interfere with Inquest Proceedings

The Sessions Court found Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal guilty of contempt of court, linking his statements at a political ceramah to potential interference with the inquest into the death of 13-year-old Zara Qairina Mahathir. The court ruled that remarks made during the "Jelajah Inspirasi DSSA P187 Kinabatangan" programme in September last year had the potential to disrupt the judicial process.
Remarks Made During Political Programme

Shafie's conviction stems from comments made during a political event in Kinabatangan. At the "Jelajah Inspirasi DSSA P187 Kinabatangan" programme, he reportedly questioned the ongoing inquest into Zara Qairina Mahathir's death and alleged that she had been murdered.
Ruling on Potential Interference

Sessions Court Judge Amir Shah Amir Hassan determined that Shafie's statements could interfere with the inquest proceedings. These proceedings are specifically designed to ascertain the cause and circumstances surrounding Zara Qairina Mahathir's death.
Appeal Filed Against Conviction

Following the conviction and a five-week jail sentence, which has been stayed pending appeal, Shafie's legal team confirmed they would file a notice of appeal to the High Court. The party stated its respect for the court's decision while pursuing the appellate process.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How did the court link Shafie’s statements to interfering with the inquest?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends