How do the appointment processes for NFCC differ from the proposed Public Prosecutor role?

Question

Accepted Answer

Appointment Processes for NFCC Differ from Proposed Public Prosecutor Role

The appointment processes for key positions within the National Anti-Financial Crime Centre (NFCC) are distinct from the proposed framework for the Public Prosecutor (PP), particularly concerning the role of the Prime Minister's advice. While the NFCC's Director General (DG) and Advisory Board members are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (YDPA) on the Prime Minister's advice, the proposed constitutional amendment for the Public Prosecutor explicitly removes this advisory role for the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. This divergence aims to enhance the independence of the prosecutorial function.
NFCC Advisory Board Appointment

The NFCC Advisory Board comprises a chairman, the Director General, and up to five other members. These additional members are appointed by the YDPA, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister. In making these recommendations, the Prime Minister is mandated to consider the integrity, standing, qualifications, knowledge, skills, experience in relevant fields such as finance and law, and potential conflicts of interest of the candidates. These board members serve for a term not exceeding three years and are eligible for reappointment, though they can be removed by the YDPA on the Prime Minister's advice.
NFCC Director General and Deputy Director General Appointments

The Director General (DG) of the NFCC is appointed by the YDPA, also based on the Prime Minister's advice. This appointment process, along with that of the Advisory Board members, falls under Article 40(1A) of the Federal Constitution, which generally requires the YDPA to act in accordance with advice when required by federal law. In contrast, the Deputy Director General (DDG) of the NFCC is appointed directly by the Prime Minister, indicating a different level of direct executive influence.
Proposed Public Prosecutor Appointment Framework

The proposed new Article 145A of the Federal Constitution outlines a significantly different approach for the appointment of the Public Prosecutor. Clause (21) of this proposed article explicitly states that "Notwithstanding Article 40, for the purposes of this Article, the prime minister and the Cabinet shall not advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong." This provision directly removes the Prime Minister and Cabinet from the advisory process for the PP's appointment, a marked departure from the existing mechanisms governing the NFCC's senior positions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How do the appointment processes for NFCC differ from the proposed Public Prosecutor role?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends