How does EIS differ from EPF savings for retrenchment?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Employment Insurance System (EIS) and Employees Provident Fund (EPF) represent distinct approaches to worker financial security, particularly concerning retrenchment.

The Employment Insurance System (EIS) is designed as an insurance-based scheme to provide immediate financial assistance and support services to workers who have lost their jobs. In contrast, the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) is primarily a mandatory savings fund for retirement, though it offers certain withdrawal facilities, including for retrenchment, under specific conditions. The Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) has raised concerns about the substantial annual collection of EIS funds, estimated at RM1.6 billion, questioning its necessity when compared to historical retrenchment payouts.
EIS Functions Beyond Direct Payouts

The EIS aims to provide more than just direct financial compensation. It is managed by the Social Security Organisation (Socso) and includes provisions for benefits to retrenched workers, which can range from a portion of their insured salary for three to six months. Furthermore, the system is intended to offer additional support services such as training for retrenched workers and job matching, functions that the MEF argues are already covered by other bodies like the Human Resources Development Fund (HRDF) and Jobs Malaysia.
EPF as a Retirement Savings Vehicle with Retrenchment Provisions

The EPF, on the other hand, is fundamentally a retirement savings scheme. Contributions are made by both employers and employees, with the intention of accumulating funds for retirement. While not its primary purpose, EPF allows for withdrawals in specific circumstances, such as retrenchment. The MEF has proposed an alternative model where employees contribute an additional 1% to the EPF, with employers and the government also contributing a month's wage each, potentially allowing retrenched workers to receive up to three months' wages from the combined sources.
MEF's Proposal for an EPF-Based Retrenchment Scheme

The MEF has suggested that if a system akin to EIS is to be implemented, it should be structured as a savings scheme rather than insurance. Under this proposed model, contributions made by individuals would be returned with accrued interest and dividends upon retirement if they have not been claimed for retrenchment. This approach contrasts with the EIS's ongoing insurance nature, which requires continuous contributions from the commencement of employment until retirement, regardless of the likelihood of retrenchment.
Discrepancies in Contribution Collection and Payouts

A key point of contention raised by the MEF concerns the scale of EIS collections versus historical payouts. The MEF estimates that the EIS collects approximately RM1.6 billion annually, based on a 1% contribution (0.5% each from employer and employee) on average salaries for millions of private sector workers. This figure is significantly higher than the estimated RM300 million that would have been required to compensate 50,000 Malaysian workers retrenched during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, leading the MEF to question the substantial surplus generated by the EIS.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does EIS differ from EPF savings for retrenchment?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends