How does HCGS differ from the US 2008 housing crisis approach?

Question

Accepted Answer

Housing Credit Guarantee Scheme's distinct approach compared to the US 2008 housing crisis

The Housing Credit Guarantee Scheme (HCGS) in Malaysia differs significantly from the approach seen during the 2008 US housing crisis, primarily in the management and vetting of loan applications. While the US experienced widespread foreclosures due to loosened lending standards by banks directly issuing loans, the HCGS operates through an appointed company that manages the financing process with a more stringent vetting mechanism. This distinction is crucial in mitigating risks and ensuring the scheme's sustainability.
Management and Vetting Process

The HCGS designates a specific company to oversee the entire financing process. This appointed entity is responsible for conducting thorough vetting of applicants, which contrasts with the direct lending model employed by banks in the United States prior to 2008. This centralised and controlled approach allows for more consistent and potentially stricter evaluation of a borrower's ability to repay, a key difference from the broader, less scrutinised loan origination practices observed in the US crisis.
Deposit Requirements

A notable improvement in the HCGS, as enhanced under Budget 2023, is the reduction in the mandatory deposit required from applicants. Previously, a deposit equivalent to 10% of the purchase price was mandated. The revised scheme now requires a deposit of only three monthly installments. This adjustment aims to make homeownership more accessible, particularly for fixed-income groups like B40 and M40, and those with variable incomes who may struggle with substantial upfront savings.
Financing Scope and Applicant Eligibility

The improved HCGS offers financing of up to RM400,000. Budget 2023 saw an increase in the total financing funds available for the scheme, rising from RM3 billion to RM5 billion. Crucially, the eligibility criteria have been expanded to include fixed-income earners, specifically targeting the B40 and M40 demographic. This broadened scope aims to address the issue of unsold properties, particularly within the low and medium-cost housing segments, by providing a viable financing pathway for a wider range of potential homeowners.
Potential Implications and Expert Caution

While the structural differences are apparent, an economic expert has cautioned that Malaysia should still learn from the 2008 US property overhang. The concern is that even with a more controlled vetting process, loosened housing loan conditions, as seen in the US, can lead to a high number of foreclosures if borrowers are unable to meet their repayment obligations. The expert highlighted that despite the differing mechanisms, the potential for similar adverse outcomes exists if risk assessments are not adequately conducted and managed.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does HCGS differ from the US 2008 housing crisis approach?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends