How does Rais Yatim justify the proclamation against the court injunction?

Question

Accepted Answer

Rais Yatim Justifies Proclamation Based on Adat and Constitutional Law Despite Court Injunction

Tan Sri Rais Yatim asserts that the proclamation of Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar as the 12th Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan was conducted in full adherence to the state's customary law (adat) and constitutional provisions, thereby legitimising the ceremony despite any ongoing disputes or court injunctions. He stated that the process fulfilled the rigmarole of the Adat and that the rule of law according to the Constitution had been followed, allowing Tunku Nadzaruddin to proceed with his duties as Ruler.
Adherence to Customary Law and Royal Address

The proclamation ceremony for Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar was carried out according to the state's adat, a fundamental aspect of Negeri Sembilan's traditional governance. This customary process was followed by a royal address, signifying the formal acceptance and commencement of his role. Rais Yatim indicated that the proceedings were conducted using scripts prepared by experts in Negeri Sembilan customary law, with legal and adat officials present as witnesses, reinforcing the legitimacy of the ritual.
Fulfilment of Constitutional Law

Rais Yatim explicitly stated that the proclamation adhered to the rule of law as defined by the Constitution. He contended that the process involved was legally sound and that all necessary constitutional requirements were met. This assertion aims to establish the proclamation as a lawful act, independent of external challenges or interpretations of the ongoing royal succession dispute.
Legality of the Ruler's Appointment and Legislative Assembly Dissolution

Rais Yatim questioned the legality of the recent dissolution of the Negeri Sembilan Legislative Assembly. He argued that Tunku Nadzaruddin had already been appointed Ruler by the Undang on April 19, suggesting that the subsequent proclamation was a continuation of this established appointment. Furthermore, he claimed that Article 28 of the state constitution, which defines the Ruler, did not involve consultation with the Undang regarding the dissolution, implying procedural impropriety in that action.
Freedom to Execute Duties as Ruler

Following the proclamation, Rais Yatim asserted that Tunku Nadzaruddin is now free to carry out his duties as the Yang di-Pertuan Besar. This declaration signifies a stance that the customary and constitutional legitimacy of the appointment supersedes any existing disputes or legal challenges, positioning Tunku Nadzaruddin to assume his responsibilities without impediment.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does Rais Yatim justify the proclamation against the court injunction?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends