How does royal consent under Johor law affect assembly dissolution?

Question

Accepted Answer

Royal consent under Johor law is required for the dissolution to take effect, and it is carried out through a constitutional process rather than as a political instruction.

Royal consent from Johor Regent Tunku Mahkota Ismail is part of the legal process for dissolving the Johor legislative assembly, and the dissolution takes effect only after that consent is granted. Johor Umno Liaison Committee chairman Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi said the Menteri Besar cannot dissolve the assembly at will, and the procedure must follow the provisions in the Laws of the State of Johor, specifically Article 23, Second Part. He also stated that once consent is obtained, the Menteri Besar announces the dissolution to the people, describing royal consent as a constitutional step that does not imply political interference.
Dissolution follows Article 23, Second Part of Johor law
Onn Hafiz Ghazi said the dissolution was carried out in accordance with Article 23, Second Part of the Laws of the State of Johor. The key point is that the legal framework requires royal consent as a condition for the dissolution process, rather than leaving the decision solely to the Menteri Besar’s discretion. He characterised this as a strict legal requirement under state law.
The Menteri Besar cannot dissolve the assembly at will
He clarified that the Menteri Besar cannot dissolve the state legislative assembly at will. The process must strictly follow the provisions set out in the Laws of the State of Johor, and it only takes effect after royal consent is granted by the Johor Regent. He described the sequence as presenting the matter in an audience, receiving consent, and then announcing the dissolution to the people.
Royal consent is described as constitutional, not political instruction
Onn Hafiz Ghazi said obtaining royal consent is a constitutional process and does not imply receiving instructions or political interference. In his account, the royal consent is part of the legality of the dissolution mechanism, not a directive that changes the political content of decision-making. He argued that misrepresenting the process could create a perception that the royal institution had interfered in Johor Umno’s political decisions.
Johor Umno plans police action over the allegations
After denying that the palace had “ordered” the dissolution, Onn Hafiz Ghazi said Johor Umno would lodge a police report regarding the remarks. He also described the statements as serious, noting they could touch on 3R sensitivities involving the royal institution and affect public harmony and order. His remarks tied the controversy directly to how the dissolution process is portrayed under constitutional practice.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does royal consent under Johor law affect assembly dissolution?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends