How does Section 375A of the Penal Code address sexual violence within marriage?

Question

Accepted Answer

Section 375A of the Penal Code Addresses Sexual Violence Within Marriage Through Provisions Against Hurt or Fear of Death or Hurt

Section 375A of the Penal Code addresses acts of sexual violence within marriage by criminalising a man who, during the subsistence of a valid marriage, causes hurt or fear of death or hurt to his wife or any other person with the intent to have sexual intercourse with his wife. This provision aims to penalise such actions, which are distinct from the general definition of rape under Section 375, by imposing a punishment that may extend to five years of imprisonment.
Legal Framework for Marital Sexual Violence

The existing legal framework, specifically Section 375A of the Penal Code, was enacted to address instances where violence or the threat of violence is employed within a marriage to compel sexual intercourse. This section provides a specific avenue for prosecution when a husband inflicts physical harm or instils fear of death or harm in his wife to achieve sexual access. This legal mechanism acknowledges that such coercive acts, even within the marital context, constitute a punishable offense.
Distinguishing Marital Rape from Other Offences

It is important to note that Section 375 of the Penal Code itself provides an exception, stating that sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife in a valid marriage is not considered rape under that particular section. Therefore, Section 375A was introduced to cover the specific scenario of violence or threat of violence used to coerce sexual intercourse within a marriage, differentiating it from the broader definition of rape. The penalty under Section 375A is imprisonment for a term that can extend up to five years.
Government's Stance on Criminalising Marital Rape

The government has indicated no current plans to amend existing laws to specifically criminalise marital rape as a distinct offense. This position stems from a parliamentary select committee's rejection of such an amendment in 2006, citing religious grounds and concerns over the practical difficulties in securing convictions. The deputy minister highlighted that in cases involving spouses, there is an inherent element of doubt, and the principle of criminal law dictates that the benefit of the doubt must be afforded to the accused.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does Section 375A of the Penal Code address sexual violence within marriage?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends