How does Section 17A of the MACC Act hold commercial organisations liable?

Question

Accepted Answer

Section 17A of the MACC Act Imposes Corporate Liability for Failure to Prevent Corruption

Section 17A of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 establishes criminal liability for commercial organisations that fail to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption. This provision shifts the burden of proof to the organisation's directors, partners, and management to demonstrate that they have taken sufficient measures to prevent associated persons from engaging in corrupt practices. The overarching goal is to foster a corruption-free environment within commercial operations.
Directors and Management Face Onus of Proving Adequate Procedures

Under Section 17A (3) of the MACC Act, if a commercial organisation commits an offense, individuals such as directors, controllers, officers, partners, employees, or those performing services for the organisation, including contractors, vendors, suppliers, and agents, can be held accountable. The law mandates that these individuals must prove they have implemented adequate procedures to deter associated persons from committing corrupt acts. This places a significant responsibility on the leadership to ensure robust anti-corruption frameworks are in place.
Penalties Include Substantial Fines and Imprisonment

The penalties for offenses under Section 17A are severe. Commercial organisations found liable can face fines up to ten times the value of the gratification received or RM1 million, whichever is greater. Alternatively, they may be subject to imprisonment for up to 20 years, or both. The Act explicitly allows for companies themselves to be imposed with fines as a consequence of failing to prevent corruption.
MACC Guidelines Outline Requirements for Adequate Procedures

To assist commercial organisations in meeting their obligations, the MACC has provided guidelines for what constitutes adequate procedures. These guidelines encompass six key areas: top-level commitment to anti-corruption practices, conducting thorough risk assessments, implementing effective control measures, ensuring systematic review, monitoring, and enforcement of policies, and providing comprehensive training and communication on anti-corruption matters. Adherence to these guidelines is crucial for organisations seeking to avoid liability.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does Section 17A of the MACC Act hold commercial organisations liable?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends