How does Section 17 of the Federal Constitution impact citizenship for illegitimate children?

Question

Accepted Answer

Section 17 of the Federal Constitution Dictates Citizenship for Illegitimate Children Based on Mother's Nationality

Section 17 of Part III of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution significantly impacts the citizenship status of illegitimate children in Malaysia by stipulating that references to "one of his parents," "parent," or "a person's father" shall be interpreted as referring to the mother. This provision is applied by the government to Part II of the Second Schedule, meaning that children born out of wedlock to a Malaysian father and a foreign mother are deemed to adopt the mother's citizenship and are therefore not entitled to their father's Malaysian citizenship. This interpretation by the authorities has resulted in numerous children born in Malaysia to Malaysian fathers and non-Malaysian mothers being left stateless or without any nationality.
Government's Interpretation of Section 17 Affects Citizenship by Operation of Law

Under Article 14(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, individuals born after Malaysia's formation are considered citizens by operation of law if they meet certain conditions outlined in Part II of the Second Schedule. Specifically, Section 1(a) of Part II states that a person born within Malaysia is a citizen if at least one parent was a Malaysian citizen or permanent resident at the time of birth. However, the government's stance, influenced by Section 17, is that for illegitimate children born to a Malaysian father and a foreign mother, the child automatically inherits the foreign mother's citizenship, thus not fulfilling the criteria for automatic citizenship by operation of law through the father.
Contrast with Children of Malaysian Mothers and Foreign Fathers

In a contrasting scenario, children born in Malaysia to a non-Malaysian father and a Malaysian mother, prior to the formal registration of their marriage, are automatically considered Malaysian citizens. This disparity highlights how the gender of the Malaysian parent, when combined with the interpretation of Section 17 for illegitimate births, leads to different citizenship outcomes. Lawyers and civil society groups have pointed out that this distinction raises concerns about gender discrimination, as the citizenship eligibility hinges on the gender of the Malaysian parent rather than a uniform application of citizenship laws.
Implications of Statelessness and Alternative Application Routes

The government's interpretation of Section 17 contributes to a significant number of children being stateless or lacking nationality, as they are denied Malaysian citizenship through their Malaysian fathers and may not automatically acquire their foreign mothers' citizenship. While the Deputy Home Minister previously suggested that such children could apply for citizenship under Article 15A of the Federal Constitution, which allows for citizenship in special circumstances, legal practitioners have reported that these applications often face lengthy waiting periods, up to five years, and rejections without clear reasons. This has led to concerns that children may age out and lose their eligibility before their applications are processed.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does Section 17 of the Federal Constitution impact citizenship for illegitimate children?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends