How does Section 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code differ from Section 387 on bail discretion?

Question

Accepted Answer

Bail Discretion Under Sections 387 and 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Section 387 of the Criminal Procedure Code outlines the entitlement to bail for bailable offences, where an accused person is released as a matter of right and no conditions can be imposed. In contrast, Section 388 grants discretion to the police or the Court to release individuals accused of non-bailable offences on bail, with the possibility of attaching conditions to the bail bond.
Bail for Bailable Offences Under Section 387

When an individual is charged with a bailable offence, as defined under Section 387 of the Criminal Procedure Code, they possess an inherent right to be released on bail. The law stipulates that once the accused is prepared to provide the necessary bail, the court has no discretionary power to deny the bail application. This lack of discretion to refuse bail consequently extends to the inability to impose any conditions on the bail order itself.
Discretionary Bail for Non-Bailable Offences Under Section 388

Section 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code addresses the release of individuals accused of non-bailable offences. In such cases, the law empowers either a police officer or the Court to exercise its discretion in deciding whether to grant bail. This discretionary power allows for the consideration of various factors before a decision is made.
Imposition of Conditions on Bail Bonds

A significant distinction lies in the ability to impose conditions. While Section 387, pertaining to bailable offences, strictly prohibits the imposition of any conditions on a bail order due to the absence of judicial discretion, Section 388 permits the inclusion of specific conditions within the bail bond. These conditions are typically tailored to the circumstances of the case and the nature of the non-bailable offence.
Legal Precedent on Bail Conditions

The interpretation of these sections has been informed by legal precedent, including the Supreme Court case of PP v Dato’ Mat Safuan $$1991$$. This case, which involved a non-bailable offence, highlighted that where discretion is vested in the court to grant or refuse bail, this discretion implicitly includes the power to impose conditions. Conversely, when no such discretion exists, as in the case of bailable offences under Section 387, the power to impose conditions is absent.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does Section 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code differ from Section 387 on bail discretion?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends