How does SO55(1) empower a PSSC compared to SO55(2) for the FOI Bill?

Question

Accepted Answer

SO55(1) Grants Broader Review Powers to a PSSC Compared to SO55(2)

Standing Order 55(1) of the Dewan Rakyat Standing Orders (DRSO) empowers a Parliamentary Special Select Committee (PSSC) to review both the details and the merits and principles of a Bill. This contrasts with SO55(2) DRSO, which restricts a PSSC to examining only the details of a Bill, prohibiting debate on its principles. Consequently, a committal of a Bill under SO54(1) DRSO, which operates under SO55(1), allows for a more comprehensive and substantive review than a committal under SO54(2) DRSO, which is governed by SO55(2).
Review of Merits and Principles Under SO55(1)

When a Bill is committed to a PSSC before its second reading, as stipulated by SO54(1) DRSO, the committee's mandate under SO55(1) DRSO explicitly includes the discussion of the Bill's merits and principles. This allows for a thorough examination of the fundamental aspects and underlying rationale of the proposed legislation. The Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill 2026 was referred to a PSSC under this provision, indicating an intention for a broad evaluation.
Limited Scope Under SO55(2)

In contrast, if a Bill is committed to a PSSC after its second reading, as outlined in SO54(2) DRSO, SO55(2) DRSO mandates that the committee shall not debate the principle of the Bill. The committee's scope of inquiry is thereby confined solely to the details of the legislation. This means that the foundational concepts or the broader implications of the Bill are not open for deliberation by the PSSC in such instances.
Substantive Review Enabled by SO54(1) Committal

The distinction between the two committal procedures means that a referral under SO54(1) DRSO, leading to the application of SO55(1) DRSO, facilitates a more significant and in-depth review. This type of committal is described as enabling a "substantive" review, which is also expected to be more "meaningful, transparent and inclusive." The government's decision to commit the FOI Bill under SO54(1) suggests a willingness to engage in this deeper level of scrutiny.
Broader Implications for Legislation Scrutiny

The difference in the powers granted under SO55(1) and SO55(2) highlights the parliamentary process's mechanisms for legislative scrutiny. Committing a Bill before its second reading under SO54(1) allows for a foundational assessment, potentially leading to more robust legislation by addressing principles and merits early on. Conversely, a committal after the second reading under SO54(2) focuses the committee's attention on refining the text rather than questioning the core ideas.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does SO55(1) empower a PSSC compared to SO55(2) for the FOI Bill?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends