How does the AGC justify its DNAA decision for Zahid Hamidi?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Attorney General's Chambers Justifies its DNAA Decision for Zahid Hamidi as Lawful and Circumstance-Based

The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) asserts that its decision to apply for a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) for Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi on 47 charges was made in strict compliance with the law. This application, filed on September 4, 2023, was reportedly based on the prevailing circumstances at that time, which included the necessity for further investigations. The AGC acknowledges that the matter raises significant questions concerning public confidence and the administration of justice.
Legal Compliance and Circumstantial Basis

The AGC stated that its application for the DNAA on September 4, 2023, was grounded in the legal framework and the specific circumstances present at that juncture. These circumstances, as cited by the AGC, necessitated further investigative actions. This approach led to the High Court granting Ahmad Zahid a DNAA on the 47 charges related to criminal breach of trust, corruption, and money laundering involving Yayasan Akalbudi funds.
Judicial Review and Public Confidence Concerns

A judicial review application has since been filed at the High Court, challenging the decision to grant Ahmad Zahid a DNAA. This application specifically questions the progress and the outcomes of the investigations that were referenced when the DNAA was initially sought. The AGC recognizes that these developments bring forth substantial issues regarding public trust in the legal system and the equitable administration of justice.
Cooperation with Legal Processes

In response to the ongoing judicial review, the AGC has affirmed its commitment to cooperating fully with the judicial process. The Chambers indicated that it will address the concerns raised through the established legal channels and will adhere to any subsequent court orders or decisions. The AGC stated that it would not be making further comments on the merits of the application as the matter is now before the court.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the AGC justify its DNAA decision for Zahid Hamidi?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends