How does the mufti differentiate dominance from oppression?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Mufti Differentiates Dominance from Oppression by Emphasizing that Dominance Does Not Necessarily Equate to Cruelty or Disregard for Rights

Perlis Mufti Datuk Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin has clarified his stance on the concept of a "dominant race," asserting that such dominance should not be conflated with oppression. He posited that while a nation may have a dominant race, this status does not grant license for cruelty or the infringement of the rights of other communities. He explicitly stated that any argument advocating for the oppression of other races due to the dominance of one group must be opposed.
Dominance as a Component of National Identity

The mufti articulated that for a nation to possess a distinct identity, it must have a dominant race. He drew parallels with other nations, suggesting that China is for the Chinese, and India is for Indians, implying a natural order where a dominant ethnic group defines national identity. He extended this to Europe, stating it remains for white people despite its emphasis on human rights. In this context, he questioned why Tanah Melayu (Malaysia) should not be for Malays as the dominant race, while still acknowledging that justice is for all.
Opposition to Oppressors

Datuk Mohd Asri clearly stated his opposition to any form of oppression, regardless of racial or ethnic lines. He specifically mentioned that if individuals argue that the dominance of Malays necessitates the oppression of other races, then "we must oppose such oppressors." This stance underscores his belief that dominance should not be used as a justification for mistreatment or the violation of fundamental rights.
Upholding Rights and Preventing Cruelty

Furthermore, the mufti emphasized the importance of opposing those who advocate for being "cruel to others" or who "disrespect their rights." This reinforces his distinction between the concept of a dominant race and the act of oppression, highlighting that the former should never lead to the latter. His remarks suggest a framework where national identity is tied to a dominant group, but this must coexist with the universal principles of justice and respect for all individuals.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the mufti differentiate dominance from oppression?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends