How does the Bar distinguish between political action and upholding justice?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Bar Distinguishes Between Political Action and Upholding Justice by Focusing Solely on Legal and Justice Principles

The Malaysian Bar differentiates its actions from political engagement by strictly adhering to principles of law and justice, rather than engaging with policy objectives or partisan interests. This distinction is crucial, as the Bar's interventions are driven by a need to address legal inconsistencies or potential injustices, irrespective of the individuals or political entities involved. The Bar operates with the understanding that its mandate is to serve the rule of law, not to dictate policy or engage in political discourse.
Actions are Based on Legal Principles, Not Policy Objectives

The Malaysian Bar clarifies that its court challenges, even when involving political figures like Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi or former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, are fundamentally based on legal and justice principles. President Anand Raj explained that the Bar does not challenge the policy objectives of any government or political party. Instead, the focus is on whether specific actions or decisions are "consonant with law and justice." For instance, the Bar's challenge to a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) request in Zahid's case was due to its unusual timing after significant judicial effort, a stance the Bar would take regardless of the politician's party affiliation.
The Bar Operates as a Separate Entity from Its Members

Anand Raj emphasised that the Malaysian Bar is a distinct entity from its members, who act in their personal capacities. This separation ensures that the Bar's official positions are not conflated with the personal or professional activities of individual lawyers, including those who enter politics, become Members of Parliament, or represent political clients. The Bar's engagement is thus guided by its institutional commitment to the law, not by the political affiliations or actions of its constituents.
Public Interest Cases Are Filed Against the Government on Legal Grounds

When the Malaysian Bar initiates court cases concerning public interest issues, these are typically filed against the government. Anand acknowledged that such actions might be misperceived as confrontational by the public. However, he stressed that these challenges are directed at ensuring adherence to "law and justice," rather than opposing the government's policies. The Bar's objective is to seek judicial pronouncements that serve as precedents for posterity, even when the outcome of such cases is uncertain.
The Bar Acts Only When Legal or Justice Elements are Present

The Malaysian Bar expresses its views and takes action primarily when an issue possesses a discernible legal or justice component. This includes situations where there is a propensity for injustice or a need to clarify the legally correct position. The Bar cautions against taking stances based on changing moral perceptions, preferring to anchor its positions on the enduring principles of law. For matters involving racial or religious elements, the Bar will only intervene if there are underlying legal aspects, particularly if injustice is a possibility or if a definitive legal stance is required.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the Bar distinguish between political action and upholding justice?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends