How does the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 apply to this case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Application of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 in the Java Mouse Deer Case

Eight Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) personnel have been charged under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 for the illegal possession of parts of a Java mouse deer, a species protected under the Act. The charge specifically invokes Section 60(1)(b) of the Act, read in conjunction with Section 34 of the Penal Code, for possessing these wildlife parts without the necessary licence. This legal framework outlines the prohibition against possessing protected wildlife and specifies the penalties for such violations, aiming to conserve endangered species within Malaysia.
Possession of Protected Wildlife Parts

The core of the charge against the eight FRU personnel centres on their alleged possession of eight parts belonging to a Java mouse deer. The Java mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) is explicitly listed as a protected species under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716). This designation means that any handling, possession, or trade of this species, or its parts, is strictly regulated and generally prohibited unless authorised by a valid licence. The Act aims to prevent the exploitation and potential extinction of species deemed vulnerable or endangered.
Legal Provisions for Illegal Possession

The specific offence cited is under Section 60(1)(b) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010. This section of the Act deals with the unlawful possession of wildlife or their parts. When read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, it allows for the prosecution of individuals who are jointly involved in an offence, even if their individual roles varied. This legal mechanism ensures that all parties participating in the illegal act can be held accountable.
Penalties for Violations

Conviction under Section 60(1)(b) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, as applied in this case, carries significant penalties. Upon being found guilty, offenders face a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment for up to two years, or a combination of both. These penalties are designed to act as a strong deterrent against the illegal possession and potential trafficking of protected wildlife, underscoring the seriousness with which the law views such infringements.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 apply to this case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends