How does the alternative charge of abetting differ from the main charge?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Alternative Charge of Abetting Differs from the Main Bribery Charge in Scope and Penalty

The alternative charge against Datuk Tan Eng Boon for abetting a public servant differs significantly from the main charge of bribery. The primary charge alleges Tan directly gave a RM1 million bribe to former Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor to approve an increase in development ratio for a project at Jalan Semarak. This offence, committed on December 27, 2013, falls under Section 16(b)(A) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.
The Main Charge Focuses on Direct Bribery

The core accusation in the main charge is that Tan Eng Boon actively engaged in bribery. Specifically, he is accused of providing gratification amounting to RM1 million via a Public Bank cheque from Pekan Nenas Industries Sdn Bhd, which was then deposited into Tengku Adnan's CIMB Bank account. The intent behind this alleged act was to secure approval for Nucleus Properties Sdn Bhd (now Paragon City Development Sdn Bhd) to increase the plot ratio for its development at Lot 228, Jalan Semarak.
The Alternative Charge Involves Aiding a Public Servant

In contrast, the alternative charge frames Tan Eng Boon's alleged involvement as abetting Tengku Adnan in committing an offence as a public servant. This charge, brought under Section 109 read together with Section 165 of the Penal Code, suggests Tan facilitated or encouraged Tengku Adnan to receive the RM1 million. The critical element here is that Tengku Adnan, as a public servant, allegedly received gratification from Tan, knowing that Tan had dealings related to Tengku Adnan's official duties.
Penalties for Each Charge Vary Considerably

The legal consequences for each charge are distinct. A conviction on the main bribery charge under the MACC Act 2009 carries a severe penalty of up to 20 years in jail and a fine of not less than five times the bribe amount or RM10,000, whichever is higher. However, the alternative charge of abetting, if proven, carries a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment, a fine, or both, reflecting a different emphasis on the nature of the alleged wrongdoing.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the alternative charge of abetting differ from the main charge?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends