How does the age-21 deadline force parents into difficult choices?

Question

Accepted Answer

Article 15A Citizenship Applications Face Age-21 Deadline, Forcing Difficult Parental Decisions

The age-21 deadline stipulated by Article 15A of the Federal Constitution for citizenship applications places parents in a precarious position, often forcing them into difficult choices regarding reapplications, legal action, or continued uncertainty for their children. This critical age limit creates a race against time, as the lengthy processing periods for these applications mean that decisions are frequently made when applicants are nearing this threshold, leaving parents with limited options and significant stress.
Extended Processing Times Lead to Near-Miss Deadlines

Applications submitted under Article 15A, which allows for the registration of individuals under 21 as citizens under special circumstances, are known for their protracted processing times. Lawyers report that typical response times range from two to three years, with some applications taking over four years to receive a decision. This extended delay means that by the time a decision is rendered, many applicants are already close to turning 21. For instance, a child applying at age 16 could be nearing their 20th birthday before a decision is even made, significantly narrowing the window for any further action.
Rejections Without Clear Reasons Complicate Next Steps

A significant challenge for parents is the frequent rejection of Article 15A applications without clear reasons provided. Rejection letters typically state "TIDAK BERJAYA" (unsuccessful) or "DITOLAK" (rejected), offering no specific grounds for the decision. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for parents to understand what needs to be rectified for a subsequent application to be successful. In some documented cases, initial rejections have provided a reason, such as an unregistered marriage, but subsequent applications for the same individual were rejected without any explanation, leaving parents and their legal representatives baffled.
Parents Face Dilemma of Reapplication or Legal Recourse

When an Article 15A application is rejected close to the applicant's 21st birthday, parents are confronted with a difficult decision. They must weigh the possibility of reapplying, which may again involve years of waiting and an uncertain outcome, against the prospect of pursuing costly and lengthy legal battles. Some parents delay applications until their children are eligible for a MyKad at age 12 or are enrolling in school, inadvertently compounding the time constraints. The average success rate for Article 15A applications is noted as being low, similar to Article 19, further increasing the risk associated with reapplying or initiating legal proceedings.
Legal Battles as a Last Resort

In instances where Article 15A applications are repeatedly rejected, legal action becomes a last resort for parents seeking citizenship for their children. While some individuals have successfully obtained citizenship through court proceedings, these cases are often described as lengthy and expensive. Notably, there have been instances where lawsuits were filed, but the Home Ministry and the government granted citizenship to the applicants just before their cases could be heard in the Federal Court, suggesting a potential avenue for resolution outside of definitive judicial precedent. The lack of clear guidelines and the subjective nature of Article 15A approvals contribute to the complexity and necessity of such legal interventions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How does the age-21 deadline force parents into difficult choices?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends