How has ADOR reduced its damages claim in the ongoing lawsuit?

Question

Accepted Answer

ADOR Reduced Damages Claim in Ongoing Lawsuit

ADOR has lowered its damages claim in the ongoing lawsuit from approximately 43.09 billion won to 33.09 billion won. This reduction was presented during the third hearing of the damages lawsuit at the Seoul Central District Court on July 2. The lawsuit, which also names former ADOR chief executive Min Hee Jin and Danielle's mother as defendants, centres on allegations of unauthorised solo activities by NewJeans member Danielle.
Details of the Reduced Damages Claim

The total damages sought by ADOR have been revised downwards from an initial estimate of about 43.09 billion won to 33.09 billion won. This adjustment signifies a modification in the financial scope of the agency's claim against Danielle and other defendants. The specifics of how this reduction was calculated or what factors influenced it were not detailed in the proceedings.
Background of the Lawsuit

ADOR initiated the damages lawsuit following the termination of Danielle's exclusive contract in December of the previous year. The agency contends that the dispute negatively impacted NewJeans' group activities, including contributing to members' departures and delaying the group's comeback. ADOR holds Danielle's side and Min Hee Jin liable for these disruptions.
Allegations Against Danielle

The core of ADOR's argument involves claims that Danielle pursued solo entertainment activities without the agency's explicit approval. These alleged activities include a proposed collaboration with the band Emotional Oranges, overseas magazine photoshoots, and an endorsement deal with an international luxury watch brand. ADOR specifically stated that Danielle was the only NewJeans member to engage in individual music-related work outside the agency's purview. The agency also raised concerns about Danielle's alleged involvement in dual contracts with a Chinese company and a failure to disclose pertinent information.
Defence from Danielle's Legal Team

Danielle's legal representatives have refuted ADOR's assertions. They argued that the proposed collaboration with Emotional Oranges did not materialise into any financial gain or commercial benefit. Furthermore, her lawyers contended that many of the instances cited by ADOR involved group activities undertaken by all NewJeans members, suggesting that the agency was exaggerating isolated incidents. They also challenged the assertion that an entertainment association formed by the members operated as an exclusive management agreement.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How has ADOR reduced its damages claim in the ongoing lawsuit?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends