How have the six individuals allegedly avoided service of court documents?

Question

Accepted Answer

Six Individuals Allegedly Evaded Court Document Service

Six individuals have allegedly evaded the service of court documents following the High Court's permission for committal proceedings to commence. Lawyer Steven Thiru, representing the Negeri Sembilan Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) and its secretary, stated that repeated attempts to serve the six with documents related to earlier proceedings proved unsuccessful. This alleged evasion occurred after the High Court granted his clients permission earlier in July to initiate contempt proceedings.
Unsuccessful Service Attempts Detailed

The DKU and its secretary filed a fresh application for leave to cite the six individuals for contempt of court due to an alleged breach of an interim injunction granted on June 5. Steven Thiru, the legal representative for the DKU and its secretary, highlighted that the application was necessitated by the failure to serve the six with documents from the preceding legal actions. This situation arose after the High Court had already granted permission for committal proceedings, suggesting a deliberate avoidance by the parties involved.
Committal Proceedings and Court Adjournment

The alleged avoidance of service led to a committal hearing at the High Court, which was subsequently adjourned. High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain adjourned the hearing because the Court of Appeal was scheduled to hear the six individuals' application to stay the proceedings. This adjournment indicates a procedural pause while higher court matters are addressed, stemming directly from the DKU's bid to hold the six accountable for alleged contempt.
Wider Legal Context of the Dispute

These proceedings are part of a broader dispute concerning customary and constitutional matters. The six individuals, whose statuses as Undang (traditional chiefs) or Tunku Besar are central to the conflict, are also seeking minutes from a specific DKU meeting held on April 17. Furthermore, they are challenging a decision related to the removal of Mubarak Dohak, whose own status as Undang of Sungai Ujong is contested. The interim injunction, granted on June 5, specifically prohibits the six from convening or attending meetings presented as DKU meetings, interfering with the secretary's duties, acting on the council’s behalf, or making changes that would alter the status quo prior to May 21.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How have the six individuals allegedly avoided service of court documents?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends