How is Malaysia challenging the legitimacy of the alleged Sulu heirs?

Question

Accepted Answer

Malaysia is challenging the legitimacy of the alleged Sulu heirs through diplomatic engagement in Europe and by investigating the historical validity of the 1878 agreement.

Malaysia is actively addressing the Sulu inheritance claims by appointing a senior minister to represent the government in Europe, including France, to handle the ongoing issue. This diplomatic effort is complemented by a thorough investigation into the historical underpinnings of the claims, aiming to dismantle their legal basis.
Government Representation in Europe

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said has been designated as the government's representative to Europe. She will be responsible for managing the complex issue of the Sulu inheritance claims, with potential participation from Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir. This move signifies a concerted effort to engage directly with European jurisdictions where legal actions have been pursued.
Investigation into the 1878 Agreement

A dedicated Sulu Special Secretariat, chaired by Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, is undertaking a comprehensive review of the 1878 agreement. This investigation involves visiting archives in London, the Philippines, and Malaysia to ascertain the agreement's true validity and historical context. The objective is to scrutinize the legitimacy of those presenting themselves as "claimants" or heirs to the Sulu Sultanate.
Addressing 'Forum Shopping' and Diplomatic Immunity

Malaysia has identified a pattern of 'forum shopping' by the purported Sulu heirs, where they have initiated legal actions across various countries, including Spain, France, and Luxembourg, after initial setbacks. The government has protested actions such as French bailiffs attempting to survey properties at the Malaysian Embassy in France, asserting that such premises are protected under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. This highlights Malaysia's commitment to upholding international legal principles and diplomatic immunity in its defence.
Challenging Arbitral Awards and Legitimacy

The claimants have pursued legal action in Spanish courts based on the 1878 agreement, leading to an arbitrator's ruling in their favour in 2019. This ruling was subsequently used to seize Petronas' assets in Luxembourg. Malaysia is actively pursuing all available legal remedies to invalidate these arbitral awards and is concurrently preparing legal processes to challenge the fundamental legitimacy of the individuals making these claims.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How is Malaysia challenging the legitimacy of the alleged Sulu heirs?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends