How many people must read a post for it to be considered defamatory?

Question

Accepted Answer

Defamatory posts in China can lead to a three-year jail sentence if read by over 5,000 people.

Chinese Internet users face potential jail time of up to three years if their online comments are deemed defamatory by authorities and are read by more than 5,000 individuals. This stringent measure is part of a broader effort by Chinese leaders to increase control over information dissemination, particularly in the wake of several high-profile corruption cases. The Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate issued an interpretation outlining these new parameters for online defamation.
Defamation Thresholds for Online Content

Beyond the readership threshold, online posts can also be classified as defamatory under specific conditions. If a "rumour" posted online is shared or reposted more than 500 times, it can trigger defamation accusations. Furthermore, if the content leads to severe consequences for the targeted individual, such as self-mutilation, suicide, or the development of mental disorders, it may also be subject to legal action.
Broader Campaign Against Online Rumour-Mongering

These new regulations signify an escalation in the ruling Communist Party's campaign against what it characterizes as online rumour-mongering. This initiative aims to solidify the party's oversight of information within a nation that possesses the world's largest internet user base. The government has previously implemented measures like requiring personal identification for internet and phone service registration, indicating a sustained effort to regulate online activities.
Implications for Online Discourse and Corruption Exposure

The increased scrutiny on online comments raises concerns about the potential use of defamation laws as a tool to suppress dissent and the exposure of corruption. While the internet has served as a platform for citizens to report wrongdoing, these new rules could be selectively applied to penalize such activities. This development follows instances where online information played a crucial role in uncovering official misconduct, such as the case of Yang Dacai, who was sentenced after internet users identified him wearing expensive watches.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How many people must read a post for it to be considered defamatory?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends