How much jail time and driving ban was the Porsche driver sentenced to?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Porsche Driver Received a Five-Week Jail Sentence and a 30-Month Driving Disqualification

A man driving a Porsche was sentenced to five weeks in jail and disqualified from driving for 30 months following an incident where he drove his vehicle through a barricade and into Suntec City’s Fountain of Wealth. The driver, identified as Then Shing Chong, 58, had consumed approximately one litre of beer over several hours before the crash.
Dangerous Driving Charges and Circumstances

Then Shing Chong pleaded guilty to one count of dangerous driving. This charge stemmed from his failure to adhere to traffic signs and his actions of crossing three lanes of a roundabout before colliding with the fountain structures on July 13, 2024. Court proceedings revealed that Then had been at a bar in Suntec City from around 5 pm, consuming alcohol with friends. Between 6:15 pm and midnight, he drank about a litre of beer before leaving the establishment and retrieving his Porsche.
Loss of Focus and Collision Details

In-car camera footage indicated that Then's vehicle remained stationary for approximately nine to ten seconds after a gantry barrier had lifted. While travelling on Temasek Boulevard, he reportedly lost focus and proceeded straight, disregarding road signs that directed traffic to turn left into a roundabout. Consequently, he drove across three lanes of the roundabout and breached a barricade at the Fountain of Wealth, leading to his car plunging into the basement area of the fountain.
Impact and Restitution

The incident occurred while three construction workers were present in the basement; two were working near the crash site but managed to move to safety, avoiding injury. The collision resulted in damage to the fountain area, including the barricade, planter boxes, and flooring, with repair costs estimated at S$64,580 (approximately RM204,000). Then later provided full restitution amounting to S$74,000. Although Then did not undergo an intoxication test due to his subsequent hospitalisation, his legal defence sought a report to assess his suitability for a mandatory treatment order, suggesting a link between his major depressive disorder and the offence. However, the District Judge rejected this, citing alcohol impairment as a more probable explanation given the case's facts, while acknowledging that the precise level of impairment could not be determined.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

How much jail time and driving ban was the Porsche driver sentenced to?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends