Is fear and intimidation the new governance style in Malaysia?

Question

Accepted Answer

Fear and Intimidation Characterise New Governance Style in Malaysia

A new style of governance, marked by fear and intimidation, is increasingly evident in Malaysia. This approach restricts citizens' ability to hold critical views of the executive, judiciary, or legislature, with any expression of discontent potentially leading to sedition investigations. The ultimate aim appears to be the suppression of independent thought, fostering a population of compliant individuals.
Suppression of Critical Views

This emergent governance style is characterised by an intolerance of any opinions that diverge from or critique the governing bodies. Citizens are reportedly discouraged from expressing discomfort regarding the nation's affairs, with such expressions potentially triggering investigations for sedition. This method is seen as a means to curtail independent thinking and cultivate a populace that refrains from questioning government actions.
Arrogance of Power Over Public Service

There is a perceived shift from the fundamental principle of government serving its citizens towards an "arrogance of power." Politicians and government machinery members appear to have forgotten their primary role, which is service. This has replaced the expected humility associated with public office, leading to a governance style that is less about service and more about control.
Rule by Fear is Unconstitutional

The strategy of instilling fear as a response to citizen questioning is described as reprehensible and unconstitutional. This approach demeans the fundamental rights of Malaysian citizens, undermining the very essence of their civic standing. The underlying message conveyed is that the government possesses superior knowledge and authority, negating the need for public discourse or dissent.
Call for Less Fearful Expression

The author expresses a strong desire for fear not to be the governing principle in Malaysia. There is an emphasis on the need for citizens to feel less apprehensive about voicing their opinions and engaging in critical thought. The ongoing suppression of basic rights and curtailment of critical thinking is seen as detrimental, with too much at stake for citizens to remain silent observers.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Is fear and intimidation the new governance style in Malaysia?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends