Is physical discipline still necessary for wilful disobedience?

Question

Accepted Answer

Physical Discipline for Wilful Disobedience Remains a Contentious Issue Among Malaysian Parents

A segment of Malaysian parents believes that physical discipline, including spanking, remains a necessary tool for addressing wilful disobedience in children. This perspective is contrasted by others who advocate for non-physical methods, citing concerns about potential harm and the promotion of violence. The debate is highlighted by differing personal experiences and interpretations of disciplinary approaches, with some parents referencing religious texts to support their views on physical punishment, while others point to international trends and alternative methods.
Religious and Cultural Perspectives Support Physical Discipline

Some parents, such as Azalina Azamuddin, a mother of three, argue that physical discipline is acceptable within certain limits, referencing Islamic teachings. She noted that the Quran permits caning children over the age of seven for failing to pray, and expressed a view that Malaysia should not completely abolish corporal punishment, drawing a distinction from countries like Sweden. Azalina herself employed physical discipline, primarily caning her children aged seven to eleven on their legs or buttocks for infractions like fighting or talking back, emphasizing that such actions were not abusive and had boundaries.
Parental Rights and Discretion in Discipline

Another viewpoint, articulated by Julia Yeow, asserts that parents should retain the right to decide on their disciplinary methods, viewing a ban on corporal punishment as an infringement on caregivers' rights. Yeow indicated that she and her husband use a cane on their two older sons, aged six and three, when they "cross certain lines," confining the physical discipline to the palms and buttocks. She also mentioned that they combine these methods with explanations and other disciplinary tools, suggesting that different children respond to varying approaches.
Alternative Disciplinary Methods Gaining Traction

Conversely, some parents advocate for entirely non-physical disciplinary strategies. Julian Hopkins, an Irish lecturer residing in Malaysia, has never resorted to spanking his children, aged two and four. He opts for methods such as sending his older child to their room or implementing "time outs" on the sofa, believing that a child's desire for parental approval makes disapproval a significant deterrent. For older children, Hopkins suggested that withholding pocket money or grounding them could be more effective than physical punishment.
International Context and Legal Considerations

The discussion around physical discipline is also informed by international trends and legal precedents. Sweden, which outlawed corporal punishment in 1979, was the first nation to do so, and since then, 34 other countries have followed suit. This global shift away from physical punishment is juxtaposed against the ongoing trial in Sweden of a Malaysian couple, Shalwati Norshal and Azizul Raheem Awaluddin, who are accused of severe child abuse, including hitting their children with various objects for several years. The case has brought into sharp focus the differing legal and societal views on child discipline.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Is physical discipline still necessary for wilful disobedience?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends