Is the EIA report display period sufficient for public feedback?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Display Period for the Penang South Reclamation EIA Report Was Insufficient for Meaningful Public Feedback

The designated period and accessibility for the public to review the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for the Penang South Reclamation (PSR) project were inadequate, hindering genuine public engagement. A notice from the Penang state government invited the public to study the PSR EIA report at Level 3, Komtar, between April 29 and May 28, 2019, specifically during office hours (8:00 am to 5:00 pm) on weekdays. However, during a visit on May 21, 2019, the EIA report and any accompanying staff were notably absent from the designated display area.
Limited Accessibility and Absence of Materials

The Penang state government's invitation for public review of the PSR EIA report was scheduled for a 30-day period, coinciding with office working days. This timeframe, from April 29 to May 28, 2019, offered a limited window for public engagement. Further compounding the issue, the report itself was described as comprising three substantial volumes, necessitating significant time for thorough examination.
Insufficient Time for Review and Feedback

The practical availability of the EIA report for public study was further constrained. The report was only accessible from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm on office days, effectively allowing only 19 hours of potential review time during lunch breaks over the 19 working days within the consultation period. This limited access, coupled with the substantial volume of the report, raises serious questions about whether the public could adequately study and provide informed feedback within the allocated timeframe.
Lack of Transparency in Practice

The experience of attempting to access the report on May 21, 2019, highlighted a significant gap between the stated intention of transparency and the reality of public access. Despite the official notice, the EIA report and any personnel to assist the public were not present at the display area on that day. This lack of physical presence and the report's apparent unavailability cast doubt on the government's commitment to facilitating meaningful public scrutiny.
Proposed Enhancements for Genuine Consultation

To ensure a more robust and transparent public consultation process, it has been suggested that the EIA report should be made available daily, potentially extending viewing hours until 10:00 pm. Furthermore, an extended public display period of at least six months, rather than the limited 30 days, would provide a more realistic opportunity for the public to engage with the complex documentation and offer comprehensive feedback.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Is the EIA report display period sufficient for public feedback?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends